Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho KL33 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Kumho Crugen HT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Snow
78
Comfort
83
Noise
87
Treadwear
73
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho KL33

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho KL33 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
73
Wet
65
Snow
–
Comfort
73
Noise
–
Treadwear
59
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 12
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
85
B — Kumho KL33
73
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tire Rack owners 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 73
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 22
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
B — Kumho KL33
65
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 92 –
Tire Rack owners 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 65
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
78
B — Kumho KL33
–
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 91 –
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 60 –
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 10
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
83
B — Kumho KL33
73
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 94 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 67 73
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
B — Kumho KL33
–
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 –
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 14
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
73
B — Kumho KL33
59
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51KL33
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 73 59
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 12
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
77
B — Kumho KL33
65
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51KL33
Tyre Reviews owners 77 65
DriverReviews owners – 84

Scores at a glance

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Kumho KL33: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Kumho KL33
Relative Score 81 66
Dry 85 73
Wet 87 65
Snow 78 –
Comfort 83 73
Noise 87 –
Treadwear 73 59
Handling 77 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Crugen HT51

The Kumho Crugen H/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile highway tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction comparable to premium competitors. While users appreciate its fuel efficiency and handling characteristics, long-term ownership experiences are polarized by reports of uneven tread wear and significant noise degradation over time.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Positive impact on fuel economy
  • Quiet highway performance during early stages of ownership

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature or uneven shoulder wear
  • Limited capability in deep mud or severe winter conditions
  • Noise levels becoming intrusive between 45-55 mph

Observations

  • Users operating heavy-duty trucks like the Ram 1500 report stable handling and good wet-weather confidence.
  • Owners of SUVs like the 4Runner note that while the tire performs well for highway and light off-road use, it is susceptible to shoulder wear patterns.
Tire B Kumho KL33

The Kumho KL33 presents a polarizing ownership experience, often serving as an OEM choice that delivers competent dry-weather performance and comfort when new. However, the consensus is significantly marred by reports of premature tread degradation, including chunking and delamination, alongside inconsistent long-term durability and poor manufacturer warranty support.

Pros

  • Strong initial dry traction and braking performance
  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Generally comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Satisfactory handling characteristics for standard suburban driving

Cons

  • Significant reports of tread block chipping, chunking, and premature wear
  • Concerns regarding structural integrity and potential delamination
  • Increased road noise as the tire reaches mid-life
  • Unresponsive customer service regarding warranty claims

Observations

  • Users on heavier SUVs and minivans like the Kia Carnival and Audi Q5 reported faster tread wear and lack of cornering feedback.
  • Drivers of diesel-powered SUVs noted better longevity and satisfaction compared to those with gasoline-powered or luxury-segment vehicles.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Kumho KL33
Category—Summer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—SUV and 4x4
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 85 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 77 vs 65 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Kumho KL33

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.