73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
26 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES31 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES31 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecowing ES31 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 80 |
| Dry | 80 | 83 |
| Wet | 67 | 78 |
| Comfort | 77 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 75 |
| Handling | 63 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and fuel efficiency. While many users report satisfactory performance in both dry and wet conditions, a notable segment of reviewers expresses significant concerns regarding wet-weather grip and sidewall stability, suggesting it is best suited for conservative, daily driving rather than spirited maneuvers.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort
- Positive impact on fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Strong dry-weather handling and responsiveness
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions for some users
- Soft sidewalls leading to a lack of precision during cornering or lane changes
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in specific cases
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage from potholes or curbs
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks and city cars frequently praise the tire for its comfort and noise levels during daily commuting.
- Drivers of heavier or more performance-oriented vehicles occasionally report that the soft sidewalls cause a 'pitching' sensation during aggressive steering inputs.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance in wet braking can feel compromised, particularly on smaller, lighter vehicles.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
r/carros
·8 upvotes ·2026-03-04
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
r/carros
·3 upvotes ·2024-07-22
“Kumho ecowing es31 é o melhor custo benefício, tem classificação B de consumo e C de aderência, eu já tive pneu da Kumho e gostei da aderência e é um pneu macio pra conforto. Continental Power Contact 2 tbm é uma boa opção. Eu não recomendo xbri, farroad, ling long, speedmax, pois tem durabilidade baixa.”
r/ArAutos
·2 upvotes ·2025-04-04
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
r/CarsAustralia
·2 upvotes ·2026-07-05
“The es31s are utter garbage in the wet. Good in the dry, and last a long time, but awful in the wet. Don't cheap out on tyres. I'd personally avoid most 'eco' tyres, they sacrifice a lot in grip and safety. The ecopia ep150 was class leading when it launched... in 2009. It's an ancient tyre that doesn't hold up anymore. Even worse than the es31s in basically everyway. If you have to get one of those two, DON'T get the ep150s.”
Top themes
#Cost effectiveness and value#Wet weather grip#Treadwear and durability#Budget tier limitations#Urban commuting suitability
Based on 12 community posts
Tire B
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecowing ES31 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Kumho
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 78 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 77 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecowing ES31
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES31 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.