82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
78/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
38 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Kumho Solus KH17 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
56 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta HS51 — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 67 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 69 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Kumho Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 70 |
| Dry | 88 | 76 |
| Wet | 85 | 70 |
| Comfort | 84 | 70 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 77 | 67 |
| Handling | 80 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta HS51 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that offers performance comparable to premium brands for daily driving. While most users praise its wet and dry grip, comfort, and longevity, a subset of reviewers reports inconsistent experiences regarding sidewall stiffness and rapid tread wear.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Impressive tread life for many users, often exceeding 30,000 miles
Cons
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to handling 'wobble' or lack of feedback
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
- Occasional issues with aquaplaning in heavy rain
- Not recommended for high-performance or aggressive cornering
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving at high speeds noted concerns regarding sidewall stability and cornering precision.
- Drivers of compact and mid-sized sedans generally report the highest satisfaction regarding noise levels and overall comfort.
The Kumho Solus KH17 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, high-value tire that performs reliably for daily commuting and highway driving. While many users praise its dry grip and cost-effectiveness, consensus is polarized by inconsistent tread wear and reports of premature degradation, particularly when fitted as original equipment on specific compact vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong dry weather traction and road feedback
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Predictable handling characteristics for normal driving
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
- Mixed performance in wet conditions
- Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural issues
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
Observations
- Owners of Hyundai i10 and i20 models frequently report significantly lower-than-average tread life and rapid wear compared to users of other vehicle makes.
- Drivers of larger or heavier vehicles often report better satisfaction with longevity and stability than those using the tire on smaller city cars.
- Some users noted that the tire's noise profile changes significantly, becoming more audible at city speeds (40-80 km/h) while remaining quiet at highway velocities.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta HS51 | B · Kumho Solus KH17 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Kumho
70
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecsta HS51 — better wet, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 85 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 84 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 88 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 80 vs 69 on handling.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta HS51
Tire B · Kumho Solus KH17
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta HS51 also compared with
Kumho Solus KH17 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.