82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
78/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
38 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Kumho Solus Vier KH21 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta HS51 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 85 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 60 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 53 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HS51 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta HS51 | Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta HS51 | Kumho Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 71 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 85 | 85 |
| Comfort | 84 | 60 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 77 | 53 |
| Handling | 80 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta HS51 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly tire that offers performance comparable to premium brands for daily driving. While most users praise its wet and dry grip, comfort, and longevity, a subset of reviewers reports inconsistent experiences regarding sidewall stiffness and rapid tread wear.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily commuting
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Impressive tread life for many users, often exceeding 30,000 miles
Cons
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to handling 'wobble' or lack of feedback
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
- Occasional issues with aquaplaning in heavy rain
- Not recommended for high-performance or aggressive cornering
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving at high speeds noted concerns regarding sidewall stability and cornering precision.
- Drivers of compact and mid-sized sedans generally report the highest satisfaction regarding noise levels and overall comfort.
The Kumho Solus Vier KH21 is perceived as a budget-friendly all-season option that provides adequate performance when new, particularly for drivers needing legal compliance with European winter regulations. However, user consensus highlights significant longevity issues, noting that performance, noise levels, and structural integrity degrade noticeably as the tread wears.
Pros
- Cost-effective pricing compared to premium alternatives
- Certified for winter use with the mountain and snowflake symbol
- Reliable grip and handling characteristics when tires are new
- Satisfactory performance in varied weather conditions for the price point
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, particularly on front axles
- Increased road noise and reduced comfort as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Susceptibility to balancing issues and structural deformation
- High sensitivity to ambient temperature and pressure fluctuations
Observations
- Users operating estate-style vehicles, such as the VW Passat, reported significant uneven wear patterns and balancing issues.
- Long-term owners noted that the tire's performance characteristics shift negatively after approximately two years of use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta HS51 | B · Kumho Solus Vier KH21 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Kumho
71
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecsta HS51 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 84 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 77 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta HS51 scores 88 vs 83 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta HS51
Tire B · Kumho Solus Vier KH21
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta HS51 also compared with
Kumho Solus Vier KH21 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.