Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 159 reviews
Best test result: #7 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ecsta PA51 is ahead, 68–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Ecsta PA51 +465Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 S FIT AS Reviews found online 69 62 -
69
Wet
Ecsta PA51 +663Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 S FIT AS Reviews found online 68 60 -
62
Snow
Ecsta PA51 +1250Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 S FIT AS Reviews found online 57 37 -
67
Comfort
Ecsta PA51 +166Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 S FIT AS Reviews found online 64 64 -
69
Noise
Ecsta PA51 +663Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 S FIT AS Reviews found online 73 58 -
71
Treadwear
Ecsta PA51 +269Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 S FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) 70 75 Reviews found online 72 61 -
67
Handling
Ecsta PA51 +562Why this score
Source Ecsta PA51 S FIT AS Reviews found online 67 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA51 | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 63 |
| Dry | 69 | 65 |
| Wet | 69 | 63 |
| Snow | 62 | 50 |
| Comfort | 67 | 66 |
| Noise | 69 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 69 |
| Handling | 67 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Ecsta PA51
63
/ 100
S FIT AS
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Ecsta PA51 | S FIT AS | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Other | 67% #11/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | 80% #4/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | −13.3 | Same test |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 67% #7/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | 22% #15/19 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | +44.5 | Same test |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecsta PA51
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
Tire B S FIT AS
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
- Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
- Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10.5/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta PA51
63
/ 100
Laufenn S FIT AS
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better snow, wet and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 62 vs 50 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 69 vs 63 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 69 vs 63 on noise.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 67 vs 62 on handling.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.