Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho Ecsta HS52 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
84/100
7 professional tests
User signal (40%)
81/100
23 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
78
Comfort
70
Noise
80
Treadwear
75
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
84/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
83
Comfort
74
Noise
92
Treadwear
71
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Kumho Ecsta PS71 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta HS52 is stronger on dry, treadwear and handling. Kumho Ecsta PS71 is stronger on noise, wet and comfort.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta HS52 leads by 9
A — Kumho Ecsta HS52
90
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
81
Why this score
SourceEcsta HS52Ecsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) 90 79
Tyre Reviews owners 90 85
Dry Braking (% of best) 100% 92%
Dry Handling (% of best) 100% 98%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 5
A — Kumho Ecsta HS52
78
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
83
Why this score
SourceEcsta HS52Ecsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) 76 85
Tyre Reviews owners 80 80
Wet Braking (% of best) 96% 93%
Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) 64% 65%
Wet Circle (% of best) 92% 99%
Wet Handling (% of best) 99% 100%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 4
A — Kumho Ecsta HS52
70
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
74
Why this score
SourceEcsta HS52Ecsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) 74
Tyre Reviews owners 70 73

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 12
A — Kumho Ecsta HS52
80
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
92
Why this score
SourceEcsta HS52Ecsta PS71
Professional tests (TWG score) 80 92

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta HS52 leads by 4
A — Kumho Ecsta HS52
75
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
71
Why this score
SourceEcsta HS52Ecsta PS71
Tyre Reviews owners 75 71

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta HS52 leads by 4
A — Kumho Ecsta HS52
83
B — Kumho Ecsta PS71
79
Why this score
SourceEcsta HS52Ecsta PS71
Tyre Reviews owners 83 79
DriverReviews owners 78 82

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta HS52Kumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 79 79
Dry 90 81
Wet 78 83
Comfort 70 74
Noise 80 92
Treadwear 75 71
Handling 83 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 82% #18/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test -18.1 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 100% #2/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview 92% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +8 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 98% #12/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +1.7 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 83% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +5.5 Different tests
Fuel Consumption Fuel 97% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 98% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -1.6 Different tests
Abrasion Other 54% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 88% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -34.2 Different tests
Noise Other 98% #8/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test -1.7 Different tests
Price Other 68% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 62% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +6 Different tests
Value Other 57% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 47% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +10.3 Different tests
Wear Other 77% #5/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 50% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +26.7 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 33% #3/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview 14% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test +19 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 94% #14/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 97% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test -2.5 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #7/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #6/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview 93% #9/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test +3.1 Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete Wet 64% #10/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 65% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -0.8 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 92% #15/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test -6.6 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #2/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 100% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test -0.5 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta HS52

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 is widely regarded as a high-value summer tire that delivers impressive dry and wet grip, often punching above its price point. While most users praise its handling and braking capabilities, opinions on comfort and noise levels are polarized, and there are notable inconsistencies regarding tread longevity.

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet braking performance
  • Strong cornering grip and handling confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Responsive and direct steering feedback

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear reports, with some users experiencing premature degradation
  • Noise levels can be intrusive at higher speeds
  • Sensitivity to tire pressure, affecting ride comfort
  • Occasional reports of high-speed vibration or balancing issues

Observations

  • Users reported that the tire feels particularly sporty and direct on smaller 16-inch fitments.
  • SUV owners noted surprisingly strong wet-weather performance, though some experienced faster wear patterns on heavier vehicles.
  • Ride comfort is highly dependent on precise tire pressure; even slight deviations can lead to a harsh or uncomfortable experience.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta PS71

The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Predictable handling and cornering feedback
  • Strong aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
  • Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
  • Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style

Observations

  • Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
  • Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mixed

Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta HS52 is generally positive regarding its rigid sidewalls, dry grip, responsiveness, and budget-friendly pricing, though some users report mixed experiences with wet weather performance, aquaplaning, or durability over time.

r/Mazda323 ·6 upvotes ·2026-06-14

“Mini review of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 I was running some Hankook's on my GT before and the tire wall not stiff enough. Now I've mounted these Kumho Ecsta HS52's and I highly recommend them: The tire wall is nicely rigid and they grip great in the dry, took quite some intent to make them loose traction. Additionally, I've accidentally ran over a pretty big sharp looking rock at decent speed that aimed right in a tread groove (thinnest part) and the thing shrugged it off no problem. And all of this for a damn good price too! So if anyone's looking for good tires, now you know.”

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2025-09-23

“What’s up with these tyres? Kumho ectsa hs52 date code 3923, tyres are (UK) legal regards tread but I can’t imagine this damage is normal. Both front tyres have this, looks like the tread is tearing apart in multiple places. I did not fit these tyres but it was mot’d 3 months ago and has done 2k miles since. I’ve owned the car 11 months but only noticed this very recently. I am getting them replaced on Monday with little use before then but I’m curious how this has happened. Is it just a shit brand? Wear is even across the face so I don’t think it would be the alignment or anything to do with the car and the damage is random across the contact patch. It’s a Peugeot 508 2l diesel so quite a bit of weight on the nose. Fitting Bridgestone Turanza 6. Rear tyres are good, but a different brand (horizon horace 2122 date)”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-07

“I had the kumho ecsta hs52's on my previous car. I was very satisfied with them. Good grip in the dry and wet and very responsive. Kumho in general makes really good tires”

r/TyreReviews ·1 upvote ·2026-01-22

“Bad i have hs52 on my audi a3 8l quattro 1.8t i have no grip with rain.. Like cant corner fast it just goes straight... Dry its fine but wet forget it. My oncle has the same experience with kuhmo on his bmw 118 diesel he got some rims and they had pretty good threats kumho on it. He said all it wanted was to drift and spin out. He said a couple of times it did a 180 he said never again i said same don't trust my car with these tyres. Im gonna get some new rim 17" and Goodyear asymmetric 6. To replace my 16" stock rims with kumho... I have had bad tyres but never this bad. Like 1 ere prix were even better in my Mercedes even doh they became ovals.”

Top themes
#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Dry and wet grip performance#Value and price comparison#Fuel consumption and rolling resistance#Magazine test inconsistencies

Based on 16 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Mixed

Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Tire wear and longevity#UHP performance characteristics#Comparison with premium brands#Sidewall width and markings#Tire pressure management

Based on 19 community posts

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta HS52 B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover
SidewallBlackwall
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Kumho

Too close to call: Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Kumho Ecsta PS71 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Ecsta HS52 is stronger on dry, treadwear and handling. Kumho Ecsta PS71 is stronger on noise, wet and comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 92 vs 80 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 90 vs 81 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 83 vs 78 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta HS52 scores 75 vs 71 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta HS52
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.