80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
84/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
32
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
30/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS71 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 60 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS71 leads by 53
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 30 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS71 leads by 44
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 30 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 92 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS71 leads by 69
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 10 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 32 |
| Dry | 81 | 60 |
| Wet | 83 | 30 |
| Comfort | 74 | 30 |
| Noise | 92 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | – |
| Handling | 79 | 10 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
32
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money proposition
- Predictable handling and cornering feedback
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
Cons
- Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
- Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
- Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
- Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style
Observations
- Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
- Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
The Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP receives highly critical feedback, with users reporting significant deficiencies in handling, traction, and structural integrity. The consensus suggests that the tire fails to meet the performance expectations of an Ultra High Performance category, leading to a poor driving experience and safety concerns.
Cons
- Severe lack of traction and grip
- Excessive road noise
- Poor structural integrity and sidewall stability
- Unpredictable handling and excessive understeer
Observations
- Users reported significant instability and swaying during direction changes when the tires were mounted on the rear axle.
- The tire's soft construction was noted to cause handling issues even at moderate speeds, requiring electronic stability control intervention.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.
r/tires
·5 upvotes ·2022-10-17
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
r/TyreReviews
·3 upvotes ·2026-03-08
“Between those I'd go with the Premiumcontact 7 or the ZE320 if you want to save some money. The continental seems to be serious competition for premium UHP tyres, afaik it gets similar results to the PS5 in tests. I wouldn't touch any of the sporty tyres mentioned, except for the PS71 which I still wouldn't take over the Continental.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2024-10-25
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
r/TeslaUK
·2 upvotes ·2026-08-28
“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Tire wear and longevity#UHP performance characteristics#Comparison with premium brands#Sidewall width and markings#Tire pressure management
Based on 19 community posts
Tire B
Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 | B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Kumho
32
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 79 vs 10 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 83 vs 30 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 74 vs 30 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 81 vs 60 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire B · Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta PS71 also compared with
Nexen ArrowSpeed Performance UHP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.