Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 92 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 59 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 71 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 92 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 69 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 80 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 77 |
| Dry | 81 | 92 |
| Wet | 83 | 65 |
| Snow | – | 89 |
| Comfort | 74 | 75 |
| Noise | 92 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 71 |
| Handling | 79 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money proposition
- Predictable handling and cornering feedback
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
Cons
- Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
- Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
- Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
- Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style
Observations
- Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
- Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
The Yokohama Parada Spec 2 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry conditions, offering exceptional grip and steering feedback for spirited driving. While it is highly praised for its aesthetic appeal and value, users consistently report significant performance degradation in wet weather, particularly regarding standing water and aquaplaning resistance. It is best suited for enthusiasts who prioritize dry-road handling and are willing to accept a shorter tread life and compromised wet-weather safety.
Pros
- Outstanding dry-road grip and cornering stability
- Excellent value for the price point
- Attractive and aggressive tread pattern
- Responsive steering feedback and precise turn-in
- Good performance for light, sporty vehicles
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
- Rapid tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise compared to standard touring tires
- Performance drops significantly as tread depth decreases
Observations
- Owners of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheel spin in wet conditions, suggesting the tire struggles to put power down in non-dry environments.
- Drivers of lightweight sports cars (e.g., Mazda MX-5) frequently praise the tire's handling characteristics, noting it makes the car feel 'planted' in the dry.
- Users with heavy SUVs or high-horsepower vehicles noted that the soft compound leads to faster-than-average tread depletion.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
“Between those I'd go with the Premiumcontact 7 or the ZE320 if you want to save some money. The continental seems to be serious competition for premium UHP tyres, afaik it gets similar results to the PS5 in tests. I wouldn't touch any of the sporty tyres mentioned, except for the PS71 which I still wouldn't take over the Continental.”
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
Based on 19 community posts
Yokohama Parada Spec-2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 | B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Ultra High Performance Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Yokohama
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-2 if dry matters most to you.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 83 vs 65 on wet.
Yokohama Parada Spec-2 scores 92 vs 81 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.