Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PS71 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
84/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
83
Snow
–
Comfort
74
Noise
92
Treadwear
71
Handling
79

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

Ultra High Performance Summer tire

Yokohama Parada Spec-2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
143 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
65
Snow
89
Comfort
75
Noise
92
Treadwear
71
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-2 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Parada Spec-2 leads by 11
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
81
B — Yokohama Parada Spec-2
92
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
Professional tests (TWG score) 79 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 92

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ecsta PS71 leads by 18
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
83
B — Yokohama Parada Spec-2
65
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 59

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
–
B — Yokohama Parada Spec-2
89

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Parada Spec-2 leads by 1
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
74
B — Yokohama Parada Spec-2
75
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
Professional tests (TWG score) 74 –
Tyre Reviews owners 73 71

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
92
B — Yokohama Parada Spec-2
92
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
Professional tests (TWG score) 92 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
71
B — Yokohama Parada Spec-2
71
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
Tyre Reviews owners 71 69

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Parada Spec-2 leads by 1
A — Kumho Ecsta PS71
79
B — Yokohama Parada Spec-2
80
Why this score
SourceEcsta PS71Parada Spec-2
Tyre Reviews owners 79 80
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Relative Score 79 77
Dry 81 92
Wet 83 65
Snow – 89
Comfort 74 75
Noise 92 92
Treadwear 71 71
Handling 79 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta PS71

The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Predictable handling and cornering feedback
  • Strong aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
  • Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
  • Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style

Observations

  • Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
  • Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
  • Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
Tire B Yokohama Parada Spec-2

The Yokohama Parada Spec 2 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry conditions, offering exceptional grip and steering feedback for spirited driving. While it is highly praised for its aesthetic appeal and value, users consistently report significant performance degradation in wet weather, particularly regarding standing water and aquaplaning resistance. It is best suited for enthusiasts who prioritize dry-road handling and are willing to accept a shorter tread life and compromised wet-weather safety.

Pros

  • Outstanding dry-road grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Attractive and aggressive tread pattern
  • Responsive steering feedback and precise turn-in
  • Good performance for light, sporty vehicles

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Rapid tread wear, especially under spirited driving
  • Increased road noise compared to standard touring tires
  • Performance drops significantly as tread depth decreases

Observations

  • Owners of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheel spin in wet conditions, suggesting the tire struggles to put power down in non-dry environments.
  • Drivers of lightweight sports cars (e.g., Mazda MX-5) frequently praise the tire's handling characteristics, noting it makes the car feel 'planted' in the dry.
  • Users with heavy SUVs or high-horsepower vehicles noted that the soft compound leads to faster-than-average tread depletion.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Mixed

Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Tire wear and longevity#UHP performance characteristics#Comparison with premium brands#Sidewall width and markings#Tire pressure management

Based on 19 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresUltra High Performance Summer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
SidewallBlackwall—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-2 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 83 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Parada Spec-2 scores 92 vs 81 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.