Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho IZen KW17 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho IZen KW17

Winter Touring tires

Kumho IZen KW17 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
2 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
70
Snow
–
Comfort
85
Treadwear
80
Handling
35
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Laufenn

Laufenn G Fit EQ+

Summer Premium Touring tires

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
87
Snow
67
Comfort
79
Treadwear
90
Handling
83
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho IZen KW17 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) G Fit EQ+ leads by 7
A
80
B
87
Why this score
SourceIZen KW17G Fit EQ+
Tyre Reviews owners 80 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) G Fit EQ+ leads by 17
A
70
B
87
Why this score
SourceIZen KW17G Fit EQ+
Tyre Reviews owners 70 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
67

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) IZen KW17 leads by 6
A
85
B
79
Why this score
SourceIZen KW17G Fit EQ+
Tyre Reviews owners 85 77

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) G Fit EQ+ leads by 10
A
80
B
90
Why this score
SourceIZen KW17G Fit EQ+
Tyre Reviews owners 80 93

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) G Fit EQ+ leads by 48
A
35
B
83
Why this score
SourceIZen KW17G Fit EQ+
Tyre Reviews owners 35 83

Scores at a glance

CategoryKumho IZen KW17Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Relative Score 71 86
Dry 80 87
Wet 70 87
Snow – 67
Comfort 85 79
Treadwear 80 90
Handling 35 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho IZen KW17

The Kumho IZen KW17 is generally regarded as a budget-friendly winter tire that offers reliable performance on ice and snow. While it provides good value for the price, users note compromises in dry handling and wet weather traction.

Pros

  • Competitive price point
  • Strong ice traction when new
  • Consistent snow performance throughout tread life

Cons

  • Noticeable sidewall flex during dry cornering
  • Subpar wet weather grip
  • Performance limitations compared to premium winter tires

Observations

  • Users report that the tire's handling characteristics are more apparent during dry cornering maneuvers.
Tire B Laufenn G Fit EQ+

The Laufenn G Fit EQ+ is widely regarded as a high-value tire that delivers reliable performance across both wet and dry road conditions. Users consistently praise its balanced handling and affordability, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious drivers seeking dependable daily performance.

Pros

  • Excellent grip and stability on wet surfaces
  • Strong performance in dry conditions
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Consistent reliability for daily driving

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise levels
  • Moderate tread longevity

Observations

  • Users report satisfactory performance in tropical climates, specifically noting stability in heavy rain environments.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho IZen KW17 B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
CategoryWinter Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Laufenn

Winner: Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho IZen KW17 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 83 vs 35 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 87 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 90 vs 80 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 87 vs 80 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho IZen KW17
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.