55
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
54/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Solus 4 All Weather vs Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
75/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus 4 All Weather if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 4S AW21 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Solus 4 All Weather | BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 4S AW21 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Solus 4 All Weather | BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus 4 All Weather | BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Solus 4 All Weather leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Solus 4 All Weather | BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus 4 All Weather | BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 99 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 4S AW21 leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Solus 4 All Weather | BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 55 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 4S AW21 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Solus 4 All Weather | BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus 4 All Weather | Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 69 |
| Dry | 70 | 75 |
| Wet | 70 | 76 |
| Snow | – | 82 |
| Comfort | 80 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 99 |
| Treadwear | 20 | 55 |
| Handling | 50 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
55
/ 100
Tire A
69
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Solus 4 All Weather provides reliable grip across various weather conditions, including wet, dry, and light snow. However, the tire suffers from significantly premature tread wear, which undermines its value proposition as a practical year-round solution.
Pros
- Reliable traction in dry conditions
- Confident performance on wet surfaces
- Effective capability in light snow
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear
- Poor overall longevity compared to summer tires
- Lack of cost-effectiveness due to frequent replacement intervals
Observations
- Performance and grip were noted as sufficient for lightweight vehicles like the Suzuki Ignis.
The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 is generally regarded as a competent all-weather tire that excels in wet and winter conditions, providing reliable traction in cold temperatures. While users appreciate its performance in adverse weather, the tire receives mixed feedback regarding its longevity, road noise, and handling characteristics during warmer months.
Pros
- Excellent wet weather grip and stability on motorways
- Strong performance in snow and icy conditions
- Quiet and smooth ride quality during the first two years of ownership
- Aesthetically pleasing tread design
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise, described by some as excessive
- Soft compound feel during high-temperature summer driving
- Concerns regarding long-term durability and premature tread cracking
- Unusual steering feedback during low-speed maneuvering
Observations
- Drivers of compact hatchbacks, such as the VW Golf, report acceptable dry and wet grip but note a peculiar sensation in steering feel.
- Performance in warmer climates (30°C+) results in a 'soft' feeling during cornering, suggesting the compound is better suited for temperate or cold environments.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather | B · Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
55
/ 100
Kumho
69
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus 4 All Weather if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 scores 55 vs 20 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 scores 70 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Solus 4 All Weather scores 80 vs 73 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 scores 76 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Solus 4 All Weather
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Solus 4 All Weather also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.