Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Solus HA31 vs Sumitomo BC100 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Solus HA31

All Season Touring tires

Kumho Solus HA31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
82
Snow
81
Comfort
83
Noise
67
Treadwear
74
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Sumitomo

Sumitomo BC100

Summer Touring tires

Sumitomo BC100 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
70/100
18 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
80
Snow
–
Comfort
72
Noise
96
Treadwear
73
Handling
66

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Kumho Solus HA31 and Sumitomo BC100 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus HA31 is stronger on handling and comfort. Sumitomo BC100 is stronger on noise and dry.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BC100 leads by 3
A — Kumho Solus HA31
72
B — Sumitomo BC100
75
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31BC100
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 75
Tyre Reviews owners 80 75
Dry Braking (% of best) 90% 96%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus HA31 leads by 2
A — Kumho Solus HA31
82
B — Sumitomo BC100
80
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31BC100
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 85
Tyre Reviews owners 79 72
Wet Braking (% of best) 94% 92%
Wet Handling (% of best) 95% 100%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Solus HA31
81
B — Sumitomo BC100
–
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31BC100
Professional tests (TWG score) 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus HA31 leads by 11
A — Kumho Solus HA31
83
B — Sumitomo BC100
72
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31BC100
Tyre Reviews owners 83 72

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BC100 leads by 29
A — Kumho Solus HA31
67
B — Sumitomo BC100
96
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31BC100
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 96

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus HA31 leads by 1
A — Kumho Solus HA31
74
B — Sumitomo BC100
73
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31BC100
Tyre Reviews owners 74 73

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus HA31 leads by 14
A — Kumho Solus HA31
80
B — Sumitomo BC100
66
Why this score
SourceSolus HA31BC100
Tyre Reviews owners 80 66
DriverReviews owners – 80

Scores at a glance

Kumho Solus HA31 vs Sumitomo BC100: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus HA31Sumitomo BC100
Relative Score 77 77
Dry 72 75
Wet 82 80
Snow 81 –
Comfort 83 72
Noise 67 96
Treadwear 74 73
Handling 80 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 90% #12/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview 96% #7/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test -5.7 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 84% #9/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 91% #6/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test -7 Different tests
Noise Other 98% #3/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #7/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test -2.1 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 13% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 14% #7/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test -1.8 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 95% #7/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 93% #5/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test +2.3 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 94% #6/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview 92% #7/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test +1.2 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #8/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test 100% #6/8 · 2019 Mid Range Tyre Test -4 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Solus HA31

The Kumho Solus HA31 is widely regarded as a capable and cost-effective all-season solution for drivers seeking reliable winter performance without the need for seasonal tire changes. While users consistently praise its traction in snow and wet conditions, some note a compromise in high-speed stability and road noise compared to dedicated summer tires.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and confidence in heavy snow and winter conditions
  • Strong wet-weather grip and stability in windy conditions
  • Excellent value proposition for daily commuters
  • Reliable handling during cornering and highway on-ramps

Cons

  • Increased road noise at higher speeds (70mph+)
  • Noticeable softness in the tire compound during warmer temperatures
  • Inconsistent performance feedback in dry, non-winter conditions
  • Potential for reduced performance compared to premium all-weather alternatives

Observations

  • Users report successful application on smaller, economical vehicles like the Kia Rio and Peugeot 107 for daily commuting.
  • Owners of mid-size vehicles like the Nissan Altima noted a significant improvement in winter confidence compared to standard all-season tires.
Tire B Sumitomo BC100

The Sumitomo BC100 is generally regarded as a capable budget-friendly tire that offers surprising performance for daily commuting and standard driving conditions. While many users praise its wet and dry road confidence, others report inconsistent handling characteristics and premature wear, suggesting performance may vary significantly depending on vehicle weight and driving style.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Strong braking performance in emergency situations
  • Reliable wet and dry traction for standard daily driving
  • Good road-holding confidence for family-oriented vehicles

Cons

  • Tendency toward understeer during aggressive cornering
  • Reports of premature tread wear
  • Increased road noise on certain vehicle types
  • Inconsistent grip levels on imperfect road surfaces

Observations

  • Heavier vehicles, such as the 1.8-ton Volvo V90, may experience traction loss during acceleration on imperfect surfaces.
  • Users operating commercial vans reported poor handling and increased noise levels compared to passenger car users.
  • Smaller, lighter vehicles like the Fiat 500 reported unpredictable handling transitions when pushed into corners.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus HA31 B · Sumitomo BC100
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Sumitomo

Too close to call: Kumho Solus HA31 and Sumitomo BC100 are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus HA31 is stronger on handling and comfort. Sumitomo BC100 is stronger on noise and dry.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Sumitomo BC100 scores 96 vs 67 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 80 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 83 vs 72 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Sumitomo BC100 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Solus HA31
Tire B · Sumitomo BC100

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.