Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Solus HA31 vs Yokohama Geolandar X CV G057 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Solus HA31 | Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 87 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Solus HA31 | Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 87 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Solus HA31 | Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Solus HA31 | Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 87 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Solus HA31 | Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Solus HA31 | Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 90 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Solus HA31 | Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 87 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus HA31 | Yokohama Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 87 |
| Dry | 72 | 96 |
| Wet | 82 | 92 |
| Snow | 81 | 65 |
| Comfort | 83 | 92 |
| Noise | 67 | 91 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 84 |
| Handling | 80 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Solus HA31 is widely regarded as a capable and cost-effective all-season solution for drivers seeking reliable winter performance without the need for seasonal tire changes. While users consistently praise its traction in snow and wet conditions, some note a compromise in high-speed stability and road noise compared to dedicated summer tires.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and confidence in heavy snow and winter conditions
- Strong wet-weather grip and stability in windy conditions
- Excellent value proposition for daily commuters
- Reliable handling during cornering and highway on-ramps
Cons
- Increased road noise at higher speeds (70mph+)
- Noticeable softness in the tire compound during warmer temperatures
- Inconsistent performance feedback in dry, non-winter conditions
- Potential for reduced performance compared to premium all-weather alternatives
Observations
- Users report successful application on smaller, economical vehicles like the Kia Rio and Peugeot 107 for daily commuting.
- Owners of mid-size vehicles like the Nissan Altima noted a significant improvement in winter confidence compared to standard all-season tires.
The Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 is highly regarded by users as a significant performance upgrade over various OEM tire fitments. Owners consistently praise its superior wet-weather traction, quiet ride quality, and refined handling characteristics, making it a strong contender for daily-driven SUVs and crossovers.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and road confidence
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Noticeable performance improvement over OEM tires
- Strong value proposition and longevity
Cons
- Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear
- Not intended for off-road use despite the 'Geolandar' branding
- May lack the ultimate high-performance dry-track precision of dedicated summer tires
Observations
- Users with heavy vehicles, such as the Mazda CX-90 PHEV and Mercedes GL-series, report that the tire handles the vehicle weight well while improving overall ride comfort.
- Owners of luxury SUVs like the Acura RDX and Mercedes GLE noted that the tire provides a more composed and quiet experience compared to factory-installed alternatives.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus HA31 | B · Yokohama Geolandar X CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 58 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 520 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar X CV G057 — better dry, noise and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus HA31 if snow matters most to you.
Yokohama Geolandar X CV G057 scores 96 vs 72 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar X CV G057 scores 91 vs 67 on noise.
Kumho Solus HA31 scores 81 vs 65 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar X CV G057 scores 92 vs 82 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.