Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Solus KH14 vs Nexen WinGuard — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Solus KH14

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus KH14 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
37/100
1 owner review
Dry
80
Wet
30
Snow
–
Comfort
10
Treadwear
60
Handling
60

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen WinGuard

Winter Touring tires

Nexen WinGuard tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
67
Wet
65
Snow
100
Comfort
72
Treadwear
80
Handling
60

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen WinGuard — better comfort, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Solus KH14 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus KH14 leads by 13
A — Kumho Solus KH14
80
B — Nexen WinGuard
67
Why this score
SourceSolus KH14WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 80 67

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinGuard leads by 35
A — Kumho Solus KH14
30
B — Nexen WinGuard
65
Why this score
SourceSolus KH14WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 30 65

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Solus KH14
–
B — Nexen WinGuard
100
Why this score
SourceSolus KH14WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners – 100

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinGuard leads by 62
A — Kumho Solus KH14
10
B — Nexen WinGuard
72
Why this score
SourceSolus KH14WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 10 72

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinGuard leads by 20
A — Kumho Solus KH14
60
B — Nexen WinGuard
80
Why this score
SourceSolus KH14WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 60 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Solus KH14
60
B — Nexen WinGuard
60
Why this score
SourceSolus KH14WinGuard
Tyre Reviews owners 60 60

Scores at a glance

Kumho Solus KH14 vs Nexen WinGuard: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus KH14Nexen WinGuard
Relative Score 47 70
Dry 80 67
Wet 30 65
Snow – 100
Comfort 10 72
Treadwear 60 80
Handling 60 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Solus KH14

The Kumho Solus KH14 receives a mixed reception, characterized by a notable disparity between its functional performance and its refinement. While users acknowledge the tire's competent road grip, this benefit is significantly undermined by excessive cabin noise during operation.

Pros

  • Reliable road grip and traction

Cons

  • High levels of road noise
  • Poor acoustic comfort

Observations

  • No specific vehicle or size-related data was provided in the review to correlate performance trends.
Tire B Nexen WinGuard

The Nexen WinGuard is generally regarded as a capable budget-friendly winter tire that provides a significant performance upgrade over summer tires in cold and snowy conditions. While most users report reliable traction and confidence-inspiring handling in winter environments, some reviewers note that its performance on ice and in warmer temperatures is limited compared to premium alternatives.

Pros

  • Strong traction and handling in snow-covered conditions
  • Noticeable improvement in grip over summer tires in cold weather
  • Confidence-inspiring braking performance on mountain passes
  • High value-for-money proposition

Cons

  • Mediocre performance on ice
  • Poor dry-weather handling when temperatures exceed 10°C
  • Occasional difficulty with uphill starts in deep snow

Observations

  • Users report that the tire performs best when temperatures remain consistently below 4°C.
  • Performance is noted to be highly effective for mountain driving and steep inclines, though traction can be inconsistent during initial acceleration from a standstill.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus KH14 B · Nexen WinGuard
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresWinter Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Nexen

Winner: Nexen WinGuard — better comfort, wet and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Solus KH14 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen WinGuard scores 72 vs 10 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen WinGuard scores 65 vs 30 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen WinGuard scores 80 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Solus KH14 scores 80 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Solus KH14
Tire B · Nexen WinGuard

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.