78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 vs Nexen Eurowin 650 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP72 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eurowin 650 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP72 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 70 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP72 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
WinterCraft WP72 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | Nexen Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 75 |
| Dry | 82 | 80 |
| Wet | 78 | 80 |
| Snow | 86 | – |
| Comfort | 77 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 75 |
| Handling | 71 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho WinterCraft WP72 is widely regarded as a high-value performance winter tire that balances dry and wet road handling with competent snow traction. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and affordability compared to premium alternatives, some report concerns regarding high-speed stability and potential issues with tire uniformity.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium winter tire brands
- Impressive noise suppression and ride comfort
- Strong performance on dry and wet surfaces
- Reliable traction in typical winter snow and slush conditions
Cons
- Vague handling and stability at higher highway speeds
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' feel
- Potential for flat-spotting and balancing issues
- Diminishing snow grip as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and RWD vehicles report good snow traction, though some note minor slippage during aggressive cornering on wet surfaces.
- Performance-oriented vehicles like the Subaru BRZ and Tesla Model 3 find the tire to be a capable, budget-friendly alternative to extreme winter tires.
The Nexen Eurowin 650 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that delivers reliable performance in demanding alpine conditions. Users consistently praise its impressive grip on ice and heavy snow, noting that it provides a secure driving experience at an accessible price point.
Pros
- Excellent traction and control on ice and heavy snow
- High value-for-money proposition
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Consistent performance in severe winter environments
Cons
- Limited feedback regarding dry road handling characteristics
- Brand perception may not match premium tier competitors despite performance
Observations
- Proven reliability across multiple vehicle types, including compact luxury models like the Mercedes-Benz A-Class
- Demonstrated capability in extreme alpine winter conditions over multi-year usage
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | B · Nexen Eurowin 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Kumho
75
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 77 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 80 vs 75 on treadwear.
Tire A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72
Tire B · Nexen Eurowin 650
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 also compared with
Nexen Eurowin 650 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.