Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Michelin Cross Terrain — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 83 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 60 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 83 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 80 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 19 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 100 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA | Michelin Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 86 |
| Dry | 80 | 83 |
| Wet | 61 | 83 |
| Snow | 90 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 80 |
| Noise | 19 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 100 |
| Handling | 64 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A receives a polarized reception, praised for its aesthetic appeal, impressive snow traction, and quiet highway performance. However, significant concerns regarding wet-weather handling and inconsistent tread longevity suggest that performance may vary considerably based on vehicle weight and driving conditions.
Pros
- Excellent traction and predictability in snow and ice conditions
- Quiet highway ride quality for an all-terrain tire
- Robust sidewall durability against rocky terrain
- Attractive visual design with white lettering options
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance and traction issues on paved surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
- Reports of excessive road noise on specific tarmac surfaces
Observations
- Users operating pickup trucks like the Toyota Hilux reported significant traction loss in wet conditions, suggesting potential issues with rear-wheel-drive bias vehicles.
- Hybrid SUV owners, such as those with the RAV4, reported high satisfaction with highway tread longevity and noise levels.
The Michelin Cross Terrain is widely regarded as a benchmark for longevity and durability, with many users reporting exceptional tread life that often exceeds expectations. While it may not cater to high-performance driving enthusiasts, it remains a highly favored choice for everyday reliability, comfort, and consistent performance across various conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage
- Superior quietness and ride comfort
- Reliable grip and performance in winter conditions
- Significant improvement over original equipment tires
Cons
- Limited performance capabilities for high-speed or aggressive driving
- Discontinued product availability
- Performance bias favors winter conditions over dry or wet handling
Observations
- Users reported high satisfaction with longevity on mid-size SUVs like the Ford Escape, achieving over 130,000 kilometers.
- The tire is frequently cited as a superior replacement for original equipment tires, outperforming newer successor models in both noise levels and wear resistance.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA | B · Michelin Cross Terrain |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 43 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Cross Terrain — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 83 vs 61 on wet.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 100 vs 85 on treadwear.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 73 vs 64 on handling.
Michelin Cross Terrain scores 80 vs 74 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.