93
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
617 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
95
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
95/100
109 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better noise, treadwear and wet. Pick the Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 94 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 91 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Wildpeak WP A/T01 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 94 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 6
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 97 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 93 | 95 |
| Dry | 96 | 98 |
| Wet | 93 | 96 |
| Snow | 98 | 82 |
| Comfort | 93 | 96 |
| Noise | 89 | 95 |
| Treadwear | 91 | 97 |
| Handling | 94 | 97 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
93
/ 100
Tire A
95
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken Wildpeak series is widely regarded as a versatile, high-performance tire that bridges the gap between daily-driver comfort and off-road capability. While most users praise their exceptional wet and snow traction, quiet road manners, and aggressive aesthetics, a subset of users reports concerns regarding tread life longevity and a potential drop in fuel economy.
Pros
- Excellent all-weather traction, particularly in rain, mud, and snow.
- Surprisingly low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern.
- Robust construction with high resistance to punctures and trail damage.
- Strong aesthetic appeal that enhances the look of CUVs and trucks.
- Competitive pricing compared to premium-tier competitors.
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear in some high-mileage or heavy-duty applications.
- Occasional decrease in fuel efficiency (MPG) compared to stock all-season tires.
- Some users report 'spongy' steering feedback or reduced handling precision on pavement.
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by a minority of users as the tire ages.
Observations
- Subaru owners (Forester, Outback, Crosstrek) frequently cite these as the ideal 'upgrade' tire for balancing daily commuting with weekend trail use.
- Heavy-duty truck and towing users note that higher load-range variants (e.g., 10-ply) provide excellent stability but result in a noticeably stiffer ride.
- Hybrid vehicle owners (RAV4 Hybrid) report a slight, though often acceptable, reduction in fuel economy compared to low-rolling-resistance OEM tires.
The Michelin Defender LTX M/S is widely regarded as a premier all-season tire for trucks and SUVs, consistently praised for its exceptional tread longevity and balanced performance across various weather conditions. While the vast majority of users report superior ride comfort, stability, and fuel efficiency, a small minority of owners have noted issues with increased road noise as the tires age or inconsistent traction in specific wet-weather scenarios.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life often exceeding 60,000–80,000 miles
- Strong all-weather traction, particularly in dry and light snow conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and stability for heavy vehicles
- Reliable performance that often outperforms original equipment (OE) tires
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tire tread wears down
- Higher price point compared to competitors
- Occasional reports of reduced wet-weather grip or traction loss during turns
- Limited off-road capability in mud or deep sand
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (RAM 2500/3500) report high satisfaction with durability, even under heavy usage or towing conditions.
- SUV owners (Expedition, Highlander) frequently cite the tire as a significant upgrade over factory-installed rubber, specifically noting improvements in cabin quietness and fuel economy.
- Users recommend running higher tire pressures (40-45 psi) to optimize performance and handling on certain truck platforms.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer All Terrain and Off Road tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
93
/ 100
Falken
95
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better noise, treadwear and wet. Pick the Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 scores 98 vs 82 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 95 vs 89 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 97 vs 91 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 96 vs 93 on wet.
Tire A · Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01
Tire B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 also compared with
Michelin Defender LTX M/S also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.