87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Latitude Alpin vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Latitude Alpin — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Alpin | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Alpin | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Alpin | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Alpin | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 60 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin leads by 43
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Alpin | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 50 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Alpin | iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Alpin | Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 64 |
| Dry | 90 | 75 |
| Wet | 85 | 75 |
| Snow | 80 | – |
| Comfort | 83 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 93 | 50 |
| Handling | 83 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
87
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Latitude Alpin is highly regarded for its exceptional traction and reliability in winter, wet, and dry conditions. While users consistently praise its longevity and performance, some note a slight increase in road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Outstanding grip and stability in snow and winter conditions
- Strong performance in both wet and dry road environments
- Excellent tread longevity and durability over multiple seasons
Cons
- Increased road noise levels after significant mileage
- Slightly higher fuel consumption compared to summer-focused alternatives
- Loss of lateral stability and rubber hardening after extended long-term use (7+ years)
Observations
- Users report consistent performance across various road conditions on SUV-style vehicles like the Dacia Duster.
The Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 receives a highly critical assessment from the user, who reports poor performance across all road conditions and premature tread wear after only one season of light use. The reviewer expresses significant dissatisfaction, citing a complete lack of confidence in the tire's safety and reliability.
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear
- Poor traction on ice and snow
- Inadequate handling on wet and dry surfaces
- Lack of driver confidence in slippery conditions
Observations
- The user reported that the tire failed to last even a single season despite primarily city-based, low-mileage driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Alpin | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
87
/ 100
Michelin
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Latitude Alpin — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Latitude Alpin scores 93 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Latitude Alpin scores 83 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Latitude Alpin scores 83 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Latitude Alpin scores 90 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Latitude Alpin
Tire B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG30
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Latitude Alpin also compared with
Yokohama iceGUARD iG30 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.