77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
32 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 — better treadwear, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Latitude Tour HP if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Latitude Tour HP leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | WeatherMaster SA2 | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 79 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
WeatherMaster SA2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | WeatherMaster SA2 | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 66 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | WeatherMaster SA2 | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 59 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Latitude Tour HP leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | WeatherMaster SA2 | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 76 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
WeatherMaster SA2 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | WeatherMaster SA2 | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 69 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
WeatherMaster SA2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | WeatherMaster SA2 | Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 67 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 | Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 79 |
| Wet | 77 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 59 |
| Comfort | 73 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 69 |
| Handling | 77 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
77
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Michelin Latitude Tour HP presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and longevity on specific premium vehicles. However, a significant portion of users report inconsistent tread life, premature sidewall cracking, and disappointing wet-weather performance, leading to a mixed consensus regarding its value proposition.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
- High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
- Stable and predictable performance on highway driving
Cons
- Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
- Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
- High price point relative to performance longevity
Observations
- Users of the Land Rover Freelander reported significant mechanical issues and vibrations when replacing older Michelin Synchrone tires with the Latitude Tour HP, likely due to diameter differences.
- Owners of premium SUVs like the Porsche Macan generally report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity, whereas owners of mid-market SUVs like the Ford Escape and Honda CR-V frequently report rapid tread wear.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to vehicle suspension health, suggesting that perceived handling issues may be exacerbated by worn shock absorbers.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 | B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Touring Winter tire | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
77
/ 100
Cooper
71
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 — better treadwear, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Latitude Tour HP if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 scores 80 vs 69 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 scores 77 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 79 vs 76 on dry.
Tire A · Cooper WeatherMaster SA2
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
More comparisons
Also compared with
Cooper WeatherMaster SA2 also compared with
Michelin Latitude Tour HP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.