71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
32 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Latitude Tour HP vs Sumitomo Tour+ LST — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
45
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Latitude Tour HP — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Latitude Tour HP leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour HP | Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 65 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Latitude Tour HP leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour HP | Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 50 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour HP | Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Latitude Tour HP leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour HP | Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 50 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Latitude Tour HP leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour HP | Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 40 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Latitude Tour HP leads by 47
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Tour HP | Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 20 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Tour HP | Sumitomo Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 45 |
| Dry | 79 | 65 |
| Wet | 67 | 50 |
| Snow | 59 | – |
| Comfort | 76 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 40 |
| Handling | 67 | 20 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
45
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Latitude Tour HP presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and longevity on specific premium vehicles. However, a significant portion of users report inconsistent tread life, premature sidewall cracking, and disappointing wet-weather performance, leading to a mixed consensus regarding its value proposition.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
- High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
- Stable and predictable performance on highway driving
Cons
- Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
- Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
- High price point relative to performance longevity
Observations
- Users of the Land Rover Freelander reported significant mechanical issues and vibrations when replacing older Michelin Synchrone tires with the Latitude Tour HP, likely due to diameter differences.
- Owners of premium SUVs like the Porsche Macan generally report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity, whereas owners of mid-market SUVs like the Ford Escape and Honda CR-V frequently report rapid tread wear.
- Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to vehicle suspension health, suggesting that perceived handling issues may be exacerbated by worn shock absorbers.
The Sumitomo Tour+ LST is perceived as a budget-oriented tire that prioritizes longevity over performance. While it offers improved tread durability compared to premium touring alternatives, users report a noticeable compromise in handling and overall grip.
Pros
- Improved tread wear longevity
- Cost-effective replacement option
Cons
- Significant reduction in grip compared to premium touring tires
- Compromised handling performance during spirited driving
Observations
- Users who prioritize tread life over cornering performance may find the trade-off acceptable for daily commuting.
- The tire is noted to perform poorly for drivers who engage in aggressive cornering.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP | B · Sumitomo Tour+ LST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Michelin
45
/ 100
Sumitomo
Winner: Michelin Latitude Tour HP — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 67 vs 20 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 69 vs 40 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 76 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 67 vs 50 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Tire B · Sumitomo Tour+ LST
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Latitude Tour HP also compared with
Sumitomo Tour+ LST also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.