Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Michelin Latitude Tour HP vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Michelin

Michelin Latitude Tour HP

All Season Touring tires

Michelin Latitude Tour HP tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
32 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
67
Snow
59
Comfort
76
Noise
–
Treadwear
69
Handling
67
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Toyo

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Summer Premium Touring tires

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
66/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
52
Wet
85
Snow
–
Comfort
61
Noise
100
Treadwear
85
Handling
79
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — better wet, treadwear and handling. Pick the Michelin Latitude Tour HP if dry and comfort matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Latitude Tour HP leads by 27
A
79
B
52
Why this score
SourceLatitude Tour HPProxes CF2 SUV
Professional tests (TWG score) – 31
Tire Rack owners 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 79 85

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Proxes CF2 SUV leads by 18
A
67
B
85
Why this score
SourceLatitude Tour HPProxes CF2 SUV
Professional tests (TWG score) – 90
Tire Rack owners 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 78

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
59
B
–
Why this score
SourceLatitude Tour HPProxes CF2 SUV
Tire Rack owners 64 –
Tyre Reviews owners 59 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Latitude Tour HP leads by 15
A
76
B
61
Why this score
SourceLatitude Tour HPProxes CF2 SUV
Professional tests (TWG score) – 40
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 76 93

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
100
Why this score
SourceLatitude Tour HPProxes CF2 SUV
Professional tests (TWG score) – 100

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Proxes CF2 SUV leads by 16
A
69
B
85
Why this score
SourceLatitude Tour HPProxes CF2 SUV
Tire Rack owners 71 –
Tyre Reviews owners 69 85

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Proxes CF2 SUV leads by 12
A
67
B
79
Why this score
SourceLatitude Tour HPProxes CF2 SUV
Tyre Reviews owners 67 79

Scores at a glance

CategoryMichelin Latitude Tour HPToyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Relative Score 71 75
Dry 79 52
Wet 67 85
Snow 59 –
Comfort 76 61
Noise – 100
Treadwear 69 85
Handling 67 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin Latitude Tour HP

The Michelin Latitude Tour HP presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and longevity on specific premium vehicles. However, a significant portion of users report inconsistent tread life, premature sidewall cracking, and disappointing wet-weather performance, leading to a mixed consensus regarding its value proposition.

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
  • High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
  • Stable and predictable performance on highway driving

Cons

  • Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
  • Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
  • Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
  • High price point relative to performance longevity

Observations

  • Users of the Land Rover Freelander reported significant mechanical issues and vibrations when replacing older Michelin Synchrone tires with the Latitude Tour HP, likely due to diameter differences.
  • Owners of premium SUVs like the Porsche Macan generally report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity, whereas owners of mid-market SUVs like the Ford Escape and Honda CR-V frequently report rapid tread wear.
  • Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to vehicle suspension health, suggesting that perceived handling issues may be exacerbated by worn shock absorbers.
Tire B Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Toyo

Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — better wet, treadwear and handling. Pick the Michelin Latitude Tour HP if dry and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 79 vs 52 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 85 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 85 vs 69 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.