Skip to content
Head-to-head

Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT vs Michelin LTX M/S2 — Compared

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Michelin LTX M/S2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
Owner ratings
Dry
92
Wet
90
Snow
78
Comfort
90
Noise
90
Treadwear
88
Handling
91

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin LTX M/S2 — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) LTX M/S2 leads by 15
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
77
B — Michelin LTX M/S2
92
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus RFTLTX M/S2
Tire Rack owners 86 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) LTX M/S2 leads by 23
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
67
B — Michelin LTX M/S2
90
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus RFTLTX M/S2
Tire Rack owners 79 77

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) LTX M/S2 leads by 56
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
22
B — Michelin LTX M/S2
78
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus RFTLTX M/S2
Tire Rack owners 47 92

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) LTX M/S2 leads by 23
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
67
B — Michelin LTX M/S2
90
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus RFTLTX M/S2
Tire Rack owners 76 78

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) LTX M/S2 leads by 23
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
67
B — Michelin LTX M/S2
90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) LTX M/S2 leads by 58
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
30
B — Michelin LTX M/S2
88
Why this score
SourceEcopia H/L 422 Plus RFTLTX M/S2
Tire Rack owners 56 91

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) LTX M/S2 leads by 13
A — Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
78
B — Michelin LTX M/S2
91

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT vs Michelin LTX M/S2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFTMichelin LTX M/S2
Relative Score 57 89
Dry 77 92
Wet 67 90
Snow 22 78
Comfort 67 90
Noise 67 90
Treadwear 30 88
Handling 78 91

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Michelin

Winner: Michelin LTX M/S2 — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin LTX M/S2 scores 88 vs 30 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin LTX M/S2 scores 78 vs 22 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin LTX M/S2 scores 90 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin LTX M/S2 scores 90 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus RFT
Tire B · Michelin LTX M/S2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.