37
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Avon 3D Ultra vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
84/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
94/100
1,988 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 73
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 45 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 34
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 95 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 91
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 5 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon 3D Ultra | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 37 | 90 |
| Dry | 55 | 94 |
| Wet | 10 | 83 |
| Comfort | 60 | 94 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 90 |
| Handling | 5 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
37
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon 3D Ultra receives highly polarized feedback, with users reporting vastly different experiences regarding grip and compound durability. While some riders praise the tire for its predictable handling and excellent performance during spirited riding, others report significant issues with the rubber hardening and losing traction almost immediately.
Pros
- Predictable and stable handling during spirited riding
- High levels of grip when operating within the intended temperature range
- Comfortable ride quality and smooth turn-in characteristics
Cons
- Reports of the rubber compound hardening and becoming 'shiny' prematurely
- Inconsistent grip performance leading to safety concerns
- Potential for rapid degradation in specific use cases
Observations
- Performance appears highly sensitive to riding style and surface conditions, leading to conflicting reports on thermal management.
The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is a specialized, track-focused tire that offers exceptional dry-weather grip and steering precision for high-performance vehicles. While it excels in competitive driving and track-day environments, users emphasize that it is not suitable for daily driving, particularly due to its rapid tread wear, poor wet-weather performance, and lack of cold-temperature capability.
Pros
- Unrivaled dry-weather traction and cornering grip
- Precise steering response and communicative feedback
- Excellent performance consistency during track sessions
- Superior stability at high speeds
Cons
- Extremely short tread life and rapid wear
- Significant safety risks in wet or cold conditions
- High purchase price and high cost-per-mile
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality
Observations
- Performance is highly dependent on vehicle-specific alignment settings; improper camber can lead to premature shoulder wear.
- Users note that the tire requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperatures, making it feel 'sketchy' or stiff during short street trips.
- The tire is frequently cited as a 'one-trick pony' for track-day enthusiasts, with many users recommending the Pilot Sport 4S as a more practical alternative for street-driven vehicles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon 3D Ultra | B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
37
/ 100
Avon
90
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 96 vs 5 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 83 vs 10 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 94 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 94 vs 60 on comfort.
Tire A · Avon 3D Ultra
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
More comparisons
Also compared with
Avon 3D Ultra also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.