89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Avon CR500 vs Michelin Power 5 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
15 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Avon CR500 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CR500 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | CR500 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 86 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Power 5 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | CR500 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CR500 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | CR500 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 85 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CR500 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CR500 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CR500 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | CR500 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon CR500 | Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 80 |
| Dry | 100 | 86 |
| Wet | 80 | 81 |
| Comfort | 100 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 72 |
| Handling | 100 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon CR500 is highly regarded by Caterham owners as a premier performance tire that excels in both spirited road driving and track environments. Users consistently praise its exceptional grip, precise turn-in feel, and surprising durability given its performance-oriented compound.
Pros
- Exceptional dry adhesion and cornering grip
- Precise and communicative steering turn-in feel
- Impressive tread life for a performance-focused tire
- Efficient water clearance and better-than-expected wet weather performance
Cons
- Tendency to become greasy when pushed hard for extended periods
- Limited feedback on wet-weather performance beyond light use
Observations
- Highly specialized for lightweight, high-power vehicles like the Caterham Superlight R.
- Users report an average lifespan of approximately 4,000 miles even when subjected to frequent track day usage.
The Michelin Power 5 is widely regarded as a high-performing street sport tire that excels in rapid warm-up, wet-weather confidence, and agile handling. While most riders praise its real-world versatility and grip, opinions on longevity and high-lean-angle stability are polarized, with some users preferring competitors like the Bridgestone S22 for track-oriented or aggressive riding.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
- Strong confidence-inspiring feedback during braking
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
- Mixed reports on overall mileage, with some users experiencing rapid wear under heavy engine braking
Observations
- Users on middleweight naked bikes like the KTM Duke 790 report excellent synergy and traction control performance.
- Riders with high-torque bikes featuring strong engine braking noted a 'sketchy' front-end feel and accelerated rear tire wear.
- Mileage reports vary significantly, ranging from 2,500 miles to over 8,000 miles depending on riding style and bike weight.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon CR500 | B · Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Avon
80
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Avon CR500 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Avon CR500 scores 100 vs 81 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Avon CR500 scores 100 vs 85 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Avon CR500 scores 100 vs 86 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Avon CR500 scores 80 vs 72 on treadwear.
Tire A · Avon CR500
Tire B · Michelin Power 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Avon CR500 also compared with
Michelin Power 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.