Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Michelin Primacy 4 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 85 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 94% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 94% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 65% | 93% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 89% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 83 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 92 | 75 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 82 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS71 | Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 77 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 81 |
| Dry | 81 | 87 |
| Wet | 83 | 83 |
| Comfort | 74 | 77 |
| Noise | 92 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 82 |
| Handling | 79 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 100% #1/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 94% #4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | +6.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #6/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #3/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | -2.6 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #12/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 99% #12/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | -0.4 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 97% #4/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 90% #2/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +6.8 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 98% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #33/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -0 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 88% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 43% #4/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +45.1 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #20/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 99% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 62% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 94% #11/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | -32.6 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 47% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 52% #16/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -5.2 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 78% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 86% #4/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -7.7 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 20% #5/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested | -3.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 97% #3/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | +3.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 78% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested | -22.2 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 70% #7/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 86% #7/12 · 2020 Tyre Reviews Ultimate Summer Tyre Test | -16 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 60% #13/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 93% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | -33.3 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #20/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #9/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 94% #6/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +6 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 65% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 93% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -27.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 97% #7/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test | +2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 89% #5/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | +10.8 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money proposition
- Predictable handling and cornering feedback
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
Cons
- Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
- Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
- Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
- Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style
Observations
- Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
- Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
The Michelin Primacy 4 is widely regarded as a premium, long-lasting touring tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and consistent wet-weather performance. While it is highly praised for its longevity and safety, some enthusiasts find its handling 'floaty' or lacking in road feedback compared to sport-oriented tires, leading to a polarized experience depending on driving style.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Consistent performance even as the tire wears
- Strong wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
Cons
- Vague steering feel and lack of road feedback
- Soft sidewalls can feel 'mushy' or 'floaty' during spirited driving
- High price point compared to competitors
- Increased noise levels as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or EVs often report a 'floaty' sensation, which some mitigate by increasing tire pressure.
- Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks often find the tire's touring-focused design disappointing compared to UHP alternatives.
- The tire is frequently noted for transforming the ride quality of vehicles previously fitted with harsh run-flat tires.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
“Between those I'd go with the Premiumcontact 7 or the ZE320 if you want to save some money. The continental seems to be serious competition for premium UHP tyres, afaik it gets similar results to the PS5 in tests. I wouldn't touch any of the sporty tyres mentioned, except for the PS71 which I still wouldn't take over the Continental.”
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
Based on 19 community posts
Michelin Primacy 4
Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy 4 is largely positive, praising its exceptional wet braking capabilities, impressive longevity, low cabin noise, and smooth ride quality. While some users note limitations in heavy snow or rougher tarmac surfaces, it is widely recommended as a top-tier touring tire for daily driving compared to sportier alternatives like the Pilot Sport series.
“Review: Michelin Primacy 4 ST I own a 2023 N8 DCT and recently changed all four tyres from the stock CEATs after one of the tyres’ sidewall was punctured on hitting a rather deep pothole at high speed. Cost: INR 9,750 per tyre Existing tyre buyback: INR 1,000 per tyre (~15k kms) Review: I’ve been using the new tyres for a few weeks now and I’m happy with the upgrade. The difference is noticeable, but only if you pay attention. I’d say a non-savvy person won’t notice anything different unless you ask them to pay attention. At low speeds, the road noise is reduced and the vehicle is noticeably silent (almost dead silent if the roads are smooth and the engine is at low revs) and smoother. At high speeds, the noise level difference is not very noticeable due to the engine and wind noise, but the smoothness and grip is noticeably better. That said, I wouldn’t say the stock tyres are bad (in terms of both - noise and grip) as a lot of reviewers like to point out; definitely not a night and day difference for me. Lastly, I believe the fuel efficiency has improved due to the lower rolling resistance, but I don’t have enough data to claim this confidently. My verdict is to only upgrade if your current tyres are worn out. Personally, I don’t think spending close to 40k is worth it for the budget conscious. But if you have the money to spare, you will definitely be happy with the upgrade. Read more”
“Am avut primacy 4 pe o electrica. Destul de dezamagit de faptul ca dupa ~ 28.000 km s-au tocit rau de au ajuns cam la 3 mm. Placute la condus, silentioase, dar nu cele mai aderente. Pilot sport 4 pe aceiasi electrica cu primacy 4. Huruie de te doare capul. Aderenta nu o simt neaparat wow fata de primacy 4. Nu le mai suport si abia astept sa le trec pe iarna, oricum asta fiind ultima incaltare cu ele. Pe o termica am primacy 5, si sunt cele mai ok din experienta mea. Cele mai silentioase si aderente din cele 3. Dupa 20.000 km uzura a scazut cam cu 1 mm. Recomandarea mea e sa alegi primacy 5 fara ezitare.”
“Both our Polestar2 (new) and 2016 Leaf (Jap import) arrived with Primacy 4s on them. The FWD Polestar needed fronts replaced at ~35k km and being 245/45 R19s Primacy were too pricey so went with Kumho Ecsta PS71 equivalents for a lot cheaper and negligible difference in performance. The rears on the Polestar are still going strong at 45k km and look like at least 60k km will be likely. We also fitted Kumhos on our previous Leaf and were very satisfied with performance and life.”
“When I bought my freshly imported 2014 Nissan Leaf in Sept 2020 it had 27,xxx km on the odometer and a full set of Michelin Primacy 4 that were sidewall dated from very late 2018, so likely only very low mileage on them. I put another 47,000km on them before replacing with a full set of Toyo Proxes C100 Plus in April 2024 which have also been great. The Michelin fronts were certainly very worn particularly the shoulders. I really rate Toyos so would encourage you to have a look. I’ve since put 21,000km on the Toyos and even after 12,500km, in May 2025 at their most recent WOF, the fronts still measured at 7mm and rears 8mm. P.S I paid $900 total for the 4 x Toyos inc. fitting, disposal etc.”
Based on 31 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 | B · Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS71 if noise matters most to you.
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 92 vs 75 on noise.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 82 vs 71 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 87 vs 81 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 77 vs 74 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.