Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Michelin Primacy HP vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Primacy HP | Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 65 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Primacy HP | Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 51 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Primacy HP | Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Primacy HP | Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 74 | 46 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | – |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Primacy HP | Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Primacy HP | Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy HP | Yokohama Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 60 |
| Dry | 84 | 74 |
| Wet | 75 | 59 |
| Snow | – | 38 |
| Comfort | 76 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 43 |
| Handling | 74 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Primacy HP is widely regarded as a premium, long-lasting touring tire that excels in dry conditions and offers impressive fuel efficiency. While many users praise its longevity and stability on motorways, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding wet-weather performance, particularly as the tread wears down, and a high price point that some feel is not justified by its aging characteristics.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Strong dry-road grip and handling
- High fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Stable and comfortable ride quality for long-distance cruising
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread depth decreases
- High retail price compared to competitors
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Poor performance in snow and icy conditions
Observations
- Owners of heavy FWD vehicles and MPVs frequently report high satisfaction with tread wear, though some note a decline in wet-weather responsiveness on these platforms.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., GT86, FR-S) often find the tire's low-grip characteristics unpredictable or unsuited for spirited driving.
- Users with larger rim sizes (17-18 inch) occasionally report increased road noise and 'tramlining' on uneven surfaces.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Primacy HP
Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy HP is divided. While some enthusiasts view them as lacking grip and inferior compared to Michelin's performance-oriented Pilot Sport line, others appreciate them as stock tires for daily driving or playful street handling due to their predictable breakaway and low rolling resistance.
“Pilot Super Sports VS Stock Primacy HP? One of my Primacy HP tires got a screw and it's not reparable. I'm considering taking this opportunity to fit my FRS with 4 Pilot Super Sports, but I've heard the Primacy HP tires are actually pretty decent tires. I do not track my car, I just daily drive it. Will I notice a significant improvement by upgrading to the super sports? Or will they be wasted on me? My research has turned up that the Super Sports will change my life. I will inherit millions of dollars, and cats around the world will love me. This makes me think they miiiight be a little overrated. In the same light, the Primacy HP's seem to be severely underrated, and the myth about them being crappy Prius tires seems to be the anchor in the bias. Can anyone who actually knows their sh-tuff help me out here? TL;DR: I don't track my car. Will stock Primacy HP's be as good as Pilot Super Sports for my intents and purposes?”
“You will notice the difference, but if you don't track, autocross, or canyon carve, I wouldn't bother. You don't have to stick with Primacy but it's not worth the PSS. The only reason I would go PSS in that instance, is if the price is similar to Primacy HP (it might actually be similar). If you drive in snow at all I would not go with PSS. Do not go with anything more aggressive than PSS for day to day street driving. There are people who daily drive more aggressive RS3s, RE-71s, ZII Star Specs, etc. but they track/autocross, know the limits, and take it easy around standing water.”
“I agree with the other posters on the Michelin and Continental tires being a huge performance upgrade, but keep in mind that the Primacy HPs are low rolling resistance fuel economy oriented and are also used on some Prius models. You will have a 1 to 2 mpg reduction switching to summer tires.”
“PSA: The Stock Michelin Primacy HP tires are SUMMER tires! I figured, given that winter has finally arrived in much of the US, I'd make a quick reminder that this car ships in the US with summer only tires. I've noticed that this fact is rarely mentioned in threads about snowy weather or winter tires, and I myself didn't realize this until just before I bought mine. A quick explanation for the non-car guys in the sub. Most cars in the US sell new with all-season tires mounted. These are tires that maintain a balance to allow them to work OK on hot dry pavement, in the rain, and in winter weather. Not great, but OK. They're a jack of all trades, master of none In contrast, these cars (at least in the US market) shipped with summer-only tires. This means that they are NOT OK for use in winter weather--even just cold dry pavement. Summer tires are made of a compound that is too hard in cold weather, therefore not sticky even on clean pavement. In addition, they often lack the open spaces in the tread that are necessary for good snow traction.”
Based on 10 community posts
Yokohama Geolandar G91A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy HP | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Primacy HP — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy HP scores 77 vs 43 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy HP scores 75 vs 59 on wet.
Michelin Primacy HP scores 84 vs 74 on dry.
Michelin Primacy HP scores 76 vs 66 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.