Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Riken Snowtime B2 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Winter Ultra High Performance tires

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P tread pattern
Objective (60%)
93/100
29 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
28 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
86
Snow
82
Comfort
85
Noise
59
Treadwear
89
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Riken

Riken Snowtime B2

Winter Touring tires

Riken Snowtime B2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
67
Snow
95
Comfort
88
Noise
–
Treadwear
87
Handling
55

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Riken Snowtime B2 if snow and comfort matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 11
A — Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89
B — Riken Snowtime B2
78
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 870 PSnowtime B2
Professional tests (TWG score) 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 78

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 19
A — Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86
B — Riken Snowtime B2
67
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 870 PSnowtime B2
Professional tests (TWG score) 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 91 67

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Snowtime B2 leads by 13
A — Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82
B — Riken Snowtime B2
95
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 870 PSnowtime B2
Professional tests (TWG score) 78 –
Tyre Reviews owners 89 95

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Snowtime B2 leads by 3
A — Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85
B — Riken Snowtime B2
88
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 870 PSnowtime B2
Professional tests (TWG score) 82 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 88

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59
B — Riken Snowtime B2
–
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 870 PSnowtime B2
Professional tests (TWG score) 59 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 2
A — Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89
B — Riken Snowtime B2
87
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 870 PSnowtime B2
Tyre Reviews owners 89 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 33
A — Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88
B — Riken Snowtime B2
55
Why this score
SourceWinterContact TS 870 PSnowtime B2
Tyre Reviews owners 88 55

Scores at a glance

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Riken Snowtime B2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental WinterContact TS 870 PRiken Snowtime B2
Relative Score 87 78
Dry 89 78
Wet 86 67
Snow 82 95
Comfort 85 88
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 89 87
Handling 88 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is widely regarded as a premium, highly balanced winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions while offering exceptional comfort and low noise levels. Most users report high levels of confidence in varied winter weather, though a small minority of users report inconsistent performance in severe snow and ice, and some note that steering response is less sharp than dedicated performance-focused alternatives.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of cabin comfort and low road noise
  • Strong, predictable grip on snow and slush
  • Good balance of dry handling and rolling resistance
  • Solid tread life and durability for a performance winter tire

Cons

  • Premium price point compared to competitors
  • Steering feel can be perceived as 'soft' or 'jelly' compared to summer tires
  • Performance can drop off in temperatures above 8-10°C
  • Inconsistent feedback regarding extreme ice traction

Observations

  • EV and hybrid owners frequently praise the tire for its low rolling resistance and quiet operation.
  • Drivers of high-performance RWD vehicles report that while the tire provides excellent grip, it may feel less stiff and sharp during aggressive cornering compared to summer counterparts.
  • Users on larger wheel diameters (20-inch) report that the tire maintains high comfort levels without sacrificing handling.
Tire B Riken Snowtime B2

The Riken Snowtime B2 is widely regarded as a competent budget-friendly winter tire that offers surprising value, particularly regarding noise levels and tread longevity. While it provides reliable traction in snow and standing water, users note that its handling limits in dry and wet conditions are lower than premium summer tires, requiring a more cautious driving style.

Pros

  • Impressive noise suppression compared to both premium and budget competitors
  • Strong snow and slush traction for the price point
  • Excellent tread life and durability over multiple seasons
  • Noticeable improvements in fuel economy for some users

Cons

  • Lower handling limits in dry and wet conditions compared to summer tires
  • Potential for sudden loss of grip if pushed too hard in corners
  • Increased stopping distances compared to high-performance summer rubber

Observations

  • Users noted that downsizing to 16-inch wheels contributed to a cumulative improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Handling characteristics were significantly influenced by vehicle suspension health, with one user noting that perceived tire instability was actually resolved by replacing rear shocks.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B · Riken Snowtime B2
CategoryWinter Ultra High Performance tiresWinter Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Riken

Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Riken Snowtime B2 if snow and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 88 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 86 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Riken Snowtime B2 scores 95 vs 82 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 89 vs 78 on dry.

Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Tire B · Riken Snowtime B2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.