Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 1,120 reviews
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
G Fit EQ+ leads, 72–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
G Fit EQ+ +372Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 G Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 70 74 -
66
Wet
G Fit EQ+ +773Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 G Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 65 75 -
70
Comfort
NanoEnergy 3 +466Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 G Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 70 64 -
68
Treadwear
G Fit EQ+ +371Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 G Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 70 74 -
69
Handling
G Fit EQ+ +574Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 G Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 69 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | Laufenn G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 72 |
| Dry | 69 | 72 |
| Wet | 66 | 73 |
| Comfort | 70 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 71 |
| Handling | 69 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
NanoEnergy 3
G Fit EQ+
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Tire B G Fit EQ+
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions
- Reliable handling on dry surfaces
- Strong value for money
Cons
- Slightly elevated road noise reported during operation
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Winner: Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy 3 if comfort matters most to you.
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 66 on wet.
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 74 vs 69 on handling.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.
Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 72 vs 69 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.