Head-to-head Updated

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

G Fit EQ+ leads, 72–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AToyo

NanoEnergy 3

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 1,120 reviews

Tire BLaufenn

G Fit EQ+

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    G Fit EQ+ +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online7074
  2. 66

    Wet

    G Fit EQ+ +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online6575
  3. 70

    Comfort

    NanoEnergy 3 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online7064
  4. 68

    Treadwear

    G Fit EQ+ +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online7074
  5. 69

    Handling

    G Fit EQ+ +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourceNanoEnergy 3G Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online6974
Scores at a glance
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 vs Laufenn G Fit EQ+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo NanoEnergy 3Laufenn G Fit EQ+
Relative Score 68 72
Dry 69 72
Wet 66 73
Comfort 70 66
Treadwear 68 71
Handling 69 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

NanoEnergy 3

G Fit EQ+

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A NanoEnergy 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
  • Great value for money and affordable pricing
  • Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate

Cons

  • Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
  • Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
  • Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy 3 review

Tire B G Fit EQ+

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions
  • Reliable handling on dry surfaces
  • Strong value for money

Cons

  • Slightly elevated road noise reported during operation
All owner themes in the G Fit EQ+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+
CategorySummerSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo NanoEnergy 3

Laufenn G Fit EQ+

Winner: Laufenn G Fit EQ+ — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy 3 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 74 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn G Fit EQ+ scores 72 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit EQ+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Narrow edge

G Fit EQ+

Amazon