Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac Vorti R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 99 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 99% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac Vorti R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 89% | 100% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 93% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac Vorti R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac Vorti R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 34 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac Vorti R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac Vorti R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 52 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ultrac Vorti R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 96 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 81 |
| Dry | 86 | 91 |
| Wet | 80 | 80 |
| Snow | – | 100 |
| Comfort | 55 | 78 |
| Noise | 77 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 58 |
| Handling | 85 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 93% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | +5.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #4/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | +0.5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -83.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -20 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% #6/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test | -11.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 93% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test | +3.4 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers exceptional dry grip and road feedback, often rivaling premium competitors at a more accessible price point. While most users praise its handling characteristics and longevity, some drivers note a decline in wet-weather confidence when compared to top-tier alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and handling precision
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Strong road feedback and stiff sidewall construction
- Respectable tread life for an ultra-high-performance tire
Cons
- Wet weather performance can feel less secure at high power outputs
- Noticeable loss of traction as the tread depth approaches the wear limit
- May struggle to manage torque delivery on high-horsepower front-wheel-drive vehicles
Observations
- High-horsepower front-wheel-drive vehicles (300hp+) report effective power delivery, though some users suggest premium alternatives for extreme power levels.
- Users report consistent performance across a variety of platforms, ranging from hot hatches like the Astra VXR and Leon Cupra to sports cars like the Fiat 124 Spider.
The Yokohama Advan A052 is widely regarded as a benchmark-setting 200 treadwear tire, prized for its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up, and surprising wet-weather capability. While it is a favorite for autocross and spirited street driving, users frequently note that its performance can degrade during extended track sessions due to heat soak, and its tread life is notably short compared to more durable competitors.
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
- Excellent road manners, including lower noise levels and better ride comfort than many rivals.
- Predictable breakaway characteristics that inspire driver confidence.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
- High price point relative to its limited longevity.
- Susceptibility to tread delamination or chunking under extreme track use.
Observations
- Lightweight vehicles like the Mazda Miata and Lotus Elise benefit most from the tire's characteristics, while heavier cars often experience accelerated wear and heat management issues.
- Users frequently report that the tires run 'wide' for their stated size, which can lead to fitment or rubbing issues if not accounted for.
- The tire is highly sensitive to alignment; vehicles without sufficient negative camber often suffer from rapid outside-edge wear.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama ADVAN A052
The Yokohama ADVAN A052 is widely recognized by community members as a high-performance competition and autocross tire that delivers exceptional grip and competitive edge. Users frequently discuss sizing, fitment on various sports cars, and balancing their incredible track capabilities with concerns about longevity and suitability for long road trips.
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 21 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Vredestein
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better comfort, noise and handling. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R if treadwear matters most to you.
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R scores 85 vs 58 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 78 vs 55 on comfort.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 100 vs 77 on noise.
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 96 vs 85 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.