72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
81/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
85/100
212 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE-71R leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 99 | 99 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE-71R leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A052 leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 41 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A052 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 52 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 100 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A052 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 96 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 78 |
| Dry | 99 | 91 |
| Wet | 81 | 80 |
| Snow | – | 100 |
| Comfort | 41 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 100 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 58 |
| Handling | 92 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE71R is widely regarded as a benchmark 200TW tire that dominated the autocross and track day scene for years due to its exceptional dry grip and rapid heat-up characteristics. While users praise its performance and consistent handling, it is frequently noted for its short tread life, high noise levels, and a tendency to feel imprecise or 'mushy' at the absolute limit compared to newer competitors.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and turn-in precision
- Fast heat-up time ideal for autocross
- Consistent performance throughout the tire's lifespan
- Strong wet weather capability for a performance-oriented compound
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- High road noise levels
- Lack of audible feedback at the limit
- Can feel 'mushy' or imprecise under extreme track conditions
Observations
- Users running 17-inch setups on older sports cars like the Porsche Boxster reported significant improvements in handling and reduced ABS intervention compared to all-season tires.
- High-horsepower applications (e.g., 450hp GC8) benefit from the aggressive grip but contribute to faster degradation of the soft compound.
The Yokohama Advan A052 is widely regarded as a benchmark-setting 200 treadwear tire, prized for its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up, and surprising wet-weather capability. While it is a favorite for autocross and spirited street driving, users frequently note that its performance can degrade during extended track sessions due to heat soak, and its tread life is notably short compared to more durable competitors.
Pros
- Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
- Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
- Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
- Excellent road manners, including lower noise levels and better ride comfort than many rivals.
- Predictable breakaway characteristics that inspire driver confidence.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
- Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
- Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
- High price point relative to its limited longevity.
- Susceptibility to tread delamination or chunking under extreme track use.
Observations
- Lightweight vehicles like the Mazda Miata and Lotus Elise benefit most from the tire's characteristics, while heavier cars often experience accelerated wear and heat management issues.
- Users frequently report that the tires run 'wide' for their stated size, which can lead to fitment or rubbing issues if not accounted for.
- The tire is highly sensitive to alignment; vehicles without sufficient negative camber often suffer from rapid outside-edge wear.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN A052
The Yokohama ADVAN A052 is widely recognized by community members as a high-performance competition and autocross tire that delivers exceptional grip and competitive edge. Users frequently discuss sizing, fitment on various sports cars, and balancing their incredible track capabilities with concerns about longevity and suitability for long road trips.
r/tires
·9 upvotes ·2020-01-18
“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”
r/944
·7 upvotes ·2026-07-09
“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04
“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”
Top themes
#Autocross and Track Performance#Fitment and Sizing Options#Grip and Competitiveness#Tire Longevity and Wear#Road Trip Suitability
Based on 8 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | B · Yokohama ADVAN A052 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 21 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Bridgestone
78
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better comfort, treadwear and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 78 vs 41 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R scores 99 vs 91 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 58 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 96 vs 92 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN A052 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.