88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Cooper Zeon CS Sport vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Cooper Zeon CS Sport — better comfort, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Zeon CS Sport leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Zeon CS Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Zeon CS Sport leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Zeon CS Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 96 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Zeon CS Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Zeon CS Sport leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | Zeon CS Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Zeon CS Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Zeon CS Sport leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Zeon CS Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Zeon CS Sport | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Cooper Zeon CS Sport | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 77 |
| Dry | 93 | 77 |
| Wet | 96 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 80 |
| Comfort | 93 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 77 |
| Handling | 76 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 7% #15/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 8% #13/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Cooper Zeon CS Sport is widely regarded as a high-performing, value-oriented tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and wet/dry grip. While most users praise its performance-to-price ratio, some report concerns regarding accelerated tread wear, particularly under spirited driving conditions.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- High value for money compared to premium brands
- Predictable handling and progressive feedback at the limit
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Potential for premature replacement under high-mileage or aggressive use
- Less rigid sidewall feel compared to some dedicated performance run-flat tires
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires (e.g., Continental SSR3) noted a significant improvement in ride quality and impact absorption.
- High-performance vehicle owners (e.g., Subaru Impreza) reported excellent grip levels even at higher power outputs.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Cooper Zeon CS Sport | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Cooper
77
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Cooper Zeon CS Sport — better comfort, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Cooper Zeon CS Sport scores 93 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Cooper Zeon CS Sport scores 93 vs 77 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Cooper Zeon CS Sport scores 96 vs 81 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 83 vs 76 on handling.
Tire A · Cooper Zeon CS Sport
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Cooper Zeon CS Sport also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.