71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
70/100
56 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS91 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS91 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS91 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 95% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 96% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS91 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 82% | 88% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 99% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS91 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS91 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 37 | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS91 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS91 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 64 | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PS91 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PS91 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 79 |
| Dry | 82 | 77 |
| Wet | 78 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 80 |
| Comfort | 52 | 65 |
| Noise | 87 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 77 |
| Handling | 75 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #7/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | 92% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +2.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 96% #6/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | -2.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #8/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 69% #9/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +17.9 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #1/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 100% #15/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +0.3 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 82% #4/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 68% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +13.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | 4% #26/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | +8.7 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 99% #7/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 94% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +4.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 71% #6/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 80% #9/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -8.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 83% #6/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 60% #10/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +23.3 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 67% #6/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 80% #9/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | -13.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #7/8 · 2019 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 88% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | -6.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #5/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | -2.9 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta PS91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive dry grip and steering feedback, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. However, user consensus is polarized regarding tread longevity, with many owners reporting premature wear, and some experiencing inconsistent performance in wet conditions or issues with sidewall durability.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Stiff sidewalls provide sharp, responsive steering feedback
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-torque vehicles
- Inconsistent wet weather performance and aquaplaning susceptibility
- Reports of sidewall cracking or deformation after moderate use
- Tendency to tramline or follow road ruts on highway surfaces
Observations
- Owners of heavy, high-torque vehicles (e.g., BMW 5-series, performance saloons) frequently report significantly accelerated tread wear.
- BMW and Mini owners transitioning from factory run-flat tires often praise the PS91 for improved comfort and steering feel due to its specific sidewall construction.
- Some users noted that the tire's actual width when inflated can be narrower than the nominal size, leading to fitment or aesthetic concerns.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Community opinion on the Kumho Ecsta PS91 is generally mixed, praising them as a budget-friendly, good-looking max performance summer tire that rivals premium brands in daily driving comfort and appearance. However, multiple users note concerns regarding rapid tread wear, poor heat capacity under track conditions, and susceptibility to degrading under hard abuse compared to dedicated 200 treadwear or extreme performance tires.
r/e46
·222 upvotes ·2025-03-27
“Follow up on new wheels/tires for ZHP Well new wheels and tires are on aswell as aligned. I love the tire and fitment setup but really do not like the gunmetal grey color especially on imola. I will feel it out for a while but probably eventually powder coat to OEM silver. Wheels specs are 18 x 8.5 x ET50 with 255/35/18 Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 all around. -2.5 camber in the front and -2.8 in the rear.”
r/E90
·180 upvotes ·2025-09-17
“New meaty tires set up installed, now I can order spacers Went up tire sizes and they definitely fill the gap a bit. First time running sticky kumhos on anytime so excited to see how they turn out.Specs are Kumho Ecsta Ps91 235/40/18 up front and 265/40/18 in the rear. Read more”
r/e46
·39 upvotes ·2025-03-26
“New wheels and tires for my ZHP My old wheels were super beat up and tires were showing wire so I figured I’d upgrade both. Was able to get these freshly powder coated squared set (18/8.5/et 50). Im excited to feel the Kuhmo Ecsta PS91 as they are a budget friendly performance tire. 255/35/18 tires all around”
r/G37
·30 upvotes ·2026-03-21
“275/40 Square Can Fit on a Sedan Shout out to TireRack for having great information on actual tire size. Ecsta PS91 265/40 and ExtremeContact 275/40 has a tread width and section width difference of 0.1” and 0.2” respectively. Tires fit just about perfect. No rubbing so far, and don’t expect it to rub bc of the relatively minimal width change Really goes to show that tire brand matters for fitment Read more”
Top themes
#budget friendly performance#ride quality and comfort#tread wear longevity#track and heat performance#tire mixing risks#fitment and appearance
Based on 16 community posts
Tire B
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PS91 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Kumho
79
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS91 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 77 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 65 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 83 vs 75 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta PS91 scores 82 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta PS91 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.