Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama ADVAN A052 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Yokohama ADVAN A052 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
81/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
85/100
212 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
80
Snow
100
Comfort
78
Noise
100
Treadwear
58
Handling
96

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
81
Snow
80
Comfort
65
Noise
92
Treadwear
77
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better snow, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A052 leads by 14
A — Yokohama ADVAN A052
91
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
77
Why this score
SourceADVAN A052ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 68
Tire Rack owners 93 89
Tyre Reviews owners 99 90
SimpleTire owners 100 93
Dry Braking (% of best) 93% 97%
Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 98%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 1
A — Yokohama ADVAN A052
80
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
81
Why this score
SourceADVAN A052ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 80
Tire Rack owners 68 83
Tyre Reviews owners 78 81
SimpleTire owners 100 90
Wet Braking (% of best) 100% 88%
Wet Handling (% of best) 93% 97%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A052 leads by 20
A — Yokohama ADVAN A052
100
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
80
Why this score
SourceADVAN A052ADVAN Sport V105
SimpleTire owners 100 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A052 leads by 13
A — Yokohama ADVAN A052
78
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
65
Why this score
SourceADVAN A052ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 56
Tire Rack owners 78 81
Tyre Reviews owners 71 77
SimpleTire owners 100 97

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A052 leads by 8
A — Yokohama ADVAN A052
100
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
92
Why this score
SourceADVAN A052ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 93
SimpleTire owners 100 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 19
A — Yokohama ADVAN A052
58
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
77
Why this score
SourceADVAN A052ADVAN Sport V105
Tire Rack owners 58 69
Tyre Reviews owners 52 76
SimpleTire owners 100 93

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A052 leads by 13
A — Yokohama ADVAN A052
96
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
83
Why this score
SourceADVAN A052ADVAN Sport V105
Tyre Reviews owners 96 83
DriverReviews owners – 82

Scores at a glance

Yokohama ADVAN A052 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN A052Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Relative Score 83 79
Dry 91 77
Wet 80 81
Snow 100 80
Comfort 78 65
Noise 100 92
Treadwear 58 77
Handling 96 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 93% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test 97% #8/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test -4.3 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #4/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test 98% #5/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test +1.3 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test 13% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test +87.5 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test 60% #10/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test +40 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/5 · 2019 17 inch Track Day Tyre Test 88% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test +11.8 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 93% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test 97% #6/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test -3.3 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama ADVAN A052

The Yokohama Advan A052 is widely regarded as a benchmark-setting 200 treadwear tire, prized for its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up, and surprising wet-weather capability. While it is a favorite for autocross and spirited street driving, users frequently note that its performance can degrade during extended track sessions due to heat soak, and its tread life is notably short compared to more durable competitors.

Pros

  • Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
  • Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
  • Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.
  • Excellent road manners, including lower noise levels and better ride comfort than many rivals.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that inspire driver confidence.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
  • Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
  • Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
  • High price point relative to its limited longevity.
  • Susceptibility to tread delamination or chunking under extreme track use.

Observations

  • Lightweight vehicles like the Mazda Miata and Lotus Elise benefit most from the tire's characteristics, while heavier cars often experience accelerated wear and heat management issues.
  • Users frequently report that the tires run 'wide' for their stated size, which can lead to fitment or rubbing issues if not accounted for.
  • The tire is highly sensitive to alignment; vehicles without sufficient negative camber often suffer from rapid outside-edge wear.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
  • Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
  • Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
  • Predictable handling characteristics at the limit

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
  • Increased road noise reported by some users
  • Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
  • Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
  • Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
  • Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Positive

The Yokohama ADVAN A052 is widely recognized by community members as a high-performance competition and autocross tire that delivers exceptional grip and competitive edge. Users frequently discuss sizing, fitment on various sports cars, and balancing their incredible track capabilities with concerns about longevity and suitability for long road trips.

r/tires ·9 upvotes ·2020-01-18

“Yokohama ADVAN A052 315/30R18 and 265/35R18 - BEEFY!”

r/944 ·7 upvotes ·2026-07-09

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2023-07-04

“Long trip with Advans A052? I'm planning a trip to the Nürburgring to attend a trackday this October. The problem is that I live 1300 km away, so the tyres should be able to cope with that, some 20 laps at medium-fast pace at the Nordschleife, and the drive back home. Are the Advan A052 tyres way to soft for such a long trip? Will they last? Wouldn't it be wiser to settle for a more conservative set of Michelins PS4? The car is a 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera, 1210 kg... Read more”

Top themes
#Autocross and Track Performance#Fitment and Sizing Options#Grip and Competitiveness#Tire Longevity and Wear#Road Trip Suitability

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN A052 B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2110
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 22″
Tread depth7/32″9/32″
UTQG200 A A240 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN A052 — better snow, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 100 vs 80 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 77 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 91 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 78 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.