Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
79 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
72
Snow
–
Comfort
76
Noise
–
Treadwear
75
Handling
82

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
60 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
81
Snow
80
Comfort
65
Noise
92
Treadwear
77
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 is stronger on dry and comfort. Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 is stronger on wet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Neova AD07 leads by 14
A — Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
91
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
77
Why this score
SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 68
Tire Rack owners – 89
Tyre Reviews owners 87 90
SimpleTire owners 80 93

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 9
A — Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
72
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
81
Why this score
SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 80
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 76 81
SimpleTire owners 80 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
–
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
80
Why this score
SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Sport V105
SimpleTire owners 80 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Neova AD07 leads by 11
A — Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
76
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
65
Why this score
SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 56
Tire Rack owners – 81
Tyre Reviews owners 63 77
SimpleTire owners 80 97

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
–
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
92
Why this score
SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Sport V105
Professional tests (TWG score) – 93
SimpleTire owners 80 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 2
A — Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
75
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
77
Why this score
SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Sport V105
Tire Rack owners – 69
Tyre Reviews owners 65 76
SimpleTire owners 80 93

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN Sport V105 leads by 1
A — Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
82
B — Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
83
Why this score
SourceADVAN Neova AD07ADVAN Sport V105
Tyre Reviews owners 82 83
DriverReviews owners – 82

Scores at a glance

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Neova AD07Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Relative Score 78 77
Dry 91 77
Wet 72 81
Snow – 80
Comfort 76 65
Noise – 92
Treadwear 75 77
Handling 82 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

The Yokohama Advan Neova AD07 is widely regarded as a high-performance, track-oriented tire that excels in dry grip, steering feedback, and predictability. While it is highly praised for its communicative nature and progressive breakaway characteristics, users note that it is an 'endurance' style 200TW tire rather than a 'super 200' compound, meaning it prioritizes longevity and consistency over absolute peak lap times.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and steering precision
  • Highly predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
  • Excellent durability and tread life for a track-capable tire
  • Strong communication and feedback near the limit

Cons

  • Can become 'greasy' or lose grip during extended, high-heat track sessions
  • Higher road noise compared to standard summer tires
  • Performance in wet conditions is adequate but requires caution
  • Premium price point compared to some competitors

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars, such as the Lotus Elise, report that the tire significantly improves handling stability and reduces twitchiness compared to OE-spec alternatives.
  • High-horsepower vehicles (500+ whp) generally find the tire effective for street traction, though some users note that it may not match the ultimate grip of dedicated 'super 200' tires on track.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.

Pros

  • Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
  • Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
  • Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
  • Predictable handling characteristics at the limit

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
  • Increased road noise reported by some users
  • Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
  • Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
  • Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
  • Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
CategorySummer Extreme Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available110
Rim diameters16″16″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG180 A A240 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Too close to call: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 and Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 is stronger on dry and comfort. Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 91 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 scores 76 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 81 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.