Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Max Performance Summer tire

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
84
Snow
80
Comfort
79
Noise
80
Treadwear
71
Handling
74

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

Summer Max Performance tires

Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
16 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
76
Snow
40
Comfort
76
Noise
53
Treadwear
68
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better snow, noise and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
86
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
86
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo3Advan Sport ZPS
Tire Rack owners 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 83

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo3 leads by 8
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
84
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
76
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo3Advan Sport ZPS
Tire Rack owners 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners 83 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo3 leads by 40
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
80
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
40

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo3 leads by 3
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
79
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
76
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo3Advan Sport ZPS
Tire Rack owners 78 –
Tyre Reviews owners 77 57

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo3 leads by 27
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
80
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
53

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo3 leads by 3
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
71
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
68
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo3Advan Sport ZPS
Tire Rack owners 57 –
Tyre Reviews owners 69 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus S1 evo3 leads by 1
A — Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
74
B — Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
73
Why this score
SourceVentus S1 evo3Advan Sport ZPS
Tyre Reviews owners 74 73

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus S1 evo3Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
Relative Score 79 68
Dry 86 86
Wet 84 76
Snow 80 40
Comfort 79 76
Noise 80 53
Treadwear 71 68
Handling 74 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfortable summer tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often serving as a competent OEM choice for premium vehicles. While many users praise its ride quality and wet-weather confidence, a significant portion of enthusiasts note a lack of steering feedback and 'soft' sidewall characteristics that can make the handling feel less precise compared to top-tier competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.

Pros

  • Excellent wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-road traction and predictable handling at the limit
  • Competitive pricing relative to premium performance alternatives
  • Good overall durability for many daily driving applications

Cons

  • Lack of steering precision and 'numb' road feedback
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a wobbly or unstable feel during aggressive cornering
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear on specific vehicle platforms
  • Occasional reports of sidewall bubbling or structural issues on rough road surfaces

Observations

  • Users with heavy EVs and SUVs often report mixed results, with some praising the low rolling resistance and comfort, while others note rapid tread wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented sedans (e.g., BMW 3-series, Audi S3) frequently highlight the tire's comfort advantage over competitors but criticize the lack of sharp steering response.
  • The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade over stock Pirelli P Zero or Dunlop Sport Maxx tires in terms of wet-weather confidence and noise reduction.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

The Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS is a performance-oriented run-flat tire that earns praise for its dry-weather grip, cornering stability, and value when purchased as discounted 'new old stock.' However, the consensus is heavily polarized by significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear, harsh ride quality, and inconsistent performance in cold or wet conditions.

Pros

  • Strong dry-weather traction and cornering stability
  • High value proposition when purchased at clearance or discounted pricing
  • Effective run-flat capability for daily drivers
  • Improved acceleration and handling compared to some OEM alternatives

Cons

  • Extremely short tread life and premature wear
  • Harsh and noisy ride quality
  • Poor performance and lack of grip in cold or wet conditions
  • Stiff sidewalls can lead to a numb steering feel

Observations

  • Users with high-torque electric vehicles noted better rear-tire longevity compared to previous Pirelli sets.
  • Drivers of performance coupes and MINIs appreciate the ZPS run-flat technology for daily commuting, despite the inherent trade-off in ride comfort.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
CategoryMax Performance Summer tireSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better snow, noise and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 80 vs 40 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 80 vs 53 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 84 vs 76 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 79 vs 76 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.