Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 73 |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 57 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 70 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 68 |
| Dry | 86 | 86 |
| Wet | 84 | 76 |
| Snow | 80 | 40 |
| Comfort | 79 | 76 |
| Noise | 80 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 68 |
| Handling | 74 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfortable summer tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often serving as a competent OEM choice for premium vehicles. While many users praise its ride quality and wet-weather confidence, a significant portion of enthusiasts note a lack of steering feedback and 'soft' sidewall characteristics that can make the handling feel less precise compared to top-tier competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.
Pros
- Excellent wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-road traction and predictable handling at the limit
- Competitive pricing relative to premium performance alternatives
- Good overall durability for many daily driving applications
Cons
- Lack of steering precision and 'numb' road feedback
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a wobbly or unstable feel during aggressive cornering
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear on specific vehicle platforms
- Occasional reports of sidewall bubbling or structural issues on rough road surfaces
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and SUVs often report mixed results, with some praising the low rolling resistance and comfort, while others note rapid tread wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented sedans (e.g., BMW 3-series, Audi S3) frequently highlight the tire's comfort advantage over competitors but criticize the lack of sharp steering response.
- The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade over stock Pirelli P Zero or Dunlop Sport Maxx tires in terms of wet-weather confidence and noise reduction.
The Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS is a performance-oriented run-flat tire that earns praise for its dry-weather grip, cornering stability, and value when purchased as discounted 'new old stock.' However, the consensus is heavily polarized by significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear, harsh ride quality, and inconsistent performance in cold or wet conditions.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather traction and cornering stability
- High value proposition when purchased at clearance or discounted pricing
- Effective run-flat capability for daily drivers
- Improved acceleration and handling compared to some OEM alternatives
Cons
- Extremely short tread life and premature wear
- Harsh and noisy ride quality
- Poor performance and lack of grip in cold or wet conditions
- Stiff sidewalls can lead to a numb steering feel
Observations
- Users with high-torque electric vehicles noted better rear-tire longevity compared to previous Pirelli sets.
- Drivers of performance coupes and MINIs appreciate the ZPS run-flat technology for daily commuting, despite the inherent trade-off in ride comfort.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Max Performance Summer tire | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Yokohama
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better snow, noise and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 80 vs 40 on snow.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 80 vs 53 on noise.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 84 vs 76 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 79 vs 76 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.