95
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
95/100
109 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Defender LTX M/S vs Yokohama AVID S33D — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Yokohama
Yokohama AVID S33D
56
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
30/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 47
Why this score
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 94 | 35 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 63 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 38
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 48
Why this score
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 49 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Defender LTX M/S leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Defender LTX M/S | AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Defender LTX M/S | Yokohama AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 95 | 56 |
| Dry | 98 | 69 |
| Wet | 96 | 58 |
| Snow | 82 | 35 |
| Comfort | 96 | 63 |
| Noise | 95 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 97 | 49 |
| Handling | 97 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
95
/ 100
Tire A
56
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Defender LTX M/S is widely regarded as a premier all-season tire for trucks and SUVs, consistently praised for its exceptional tread longevity and balanced performance across various weather conditions. While the vast majority of users report superior ride comfort, stability, and fuel efficiency, a small minority of owners have noted issues with increased road noise as the tires age or inconsistent traction in specific wet-weather scenarios.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life often exceeding 60,000–80,000 miles
- Strong all-weather traction, particularly in dry and light snow conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and stability for heavy vehicles
- Reliable performance that often outperforms original equipment (OE) tires
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tire tread wears down
- Higher price point compared to competitors
- Occasional reports of reduced wet-weather grip or traction loss during turns
- Limited off-road capability in mud or deep sand
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (RAM 2500/3500) report high satisfaction with durability, even under heavy usage or towing conditions.
- SUV owners (Expedition, Highlander) frequently cite the tire as a significant upgrade over factory-installed rubber, specifically noting improvements in cabin quietness and fuel economy.
- Users recommend running higher tire pressures (40-45 psi) to optimize performance and handling on certain truck platforms.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S | B · Yokohama AVID S33D |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
95
/ 100
Michelin
56
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better treadwear, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 97 vs 49 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 35 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 96 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 95 vs 57 on noise.
Tire A · Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S33D
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Defender LTX M/S also compared with
Yokohama AVID S33D also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.