89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
58 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Solus TA11 vs Yokohama AVID S34F — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Yokohama
Yokohama AVID S34F
–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Kumho Solus TA11 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus TA11 | AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus TA11 | AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus TA11 | AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 71 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus TA11 | AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus TA11 | AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Solus TA11 | AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus TA11 | Yokohama AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | – |
| Dry | 92 | – |
| Wet | 90 | – |
| Snow | 80 | – |
| Comfort | 92 | – |
| Noise | 90 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
–
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Solus TA11 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly touring tire that excels in daily commuting and highway driving. While most users praise its comfort, quiet ride, and longevity, a minority of drivers report concerns regarding performance during aggressive maneuvers or in deep snow conditions.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable tread life and durability
- Consistent traction in wet and dry daily driving conditions
Cons
- Lack of rigidity for aggressive or performance-oriented driving
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow or winter conditions
- Occasional reports of road noise if not balanced correctly
- Limited feedback and 'sloppy' handling feel for spirited drivers
Observations
- Users with minivans and sedans (e.g., Honda Odyssey, Toyota Camry) report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
- Drivers of heavier or more performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Ford Mustang) note that the tire lacks the sidewall stiffness required for spirited handling.
- SUV owners note that while the tire is excellent for on-road comfort, it is not suitable for off-road or aggressive terrain use.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus TA11 | B · Yokohama AVID S34F |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 18 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 700 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Kumho
–
/ 100
Yokohama
Only Kumho Solus TA11 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Kumho Solus TA11
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S34F
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Solus TA11 also compared with
Yokohama AVID S34F also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.