Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Yokohama AVID S34PV — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Kumho Crugen HT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Snow
78
Comfort
83
Noise
87
Treadwear
73
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama AVID S34PV tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
Owner ratings
Dry
85
Wet
78
Snow
71
Comfort
85
Noise
84
Treadwear
74
Handling
84

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, snow and noise. Pick the Yokohama AVID S34PV if handling matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
85
B — Yokohama AVID S34PV
85
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51AVID S34PV
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tire Rack owners 89 85
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 9
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
B — Yokohama AVID S34PV
78
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51AVID S34PV
Professional tests (TWG score) 92 –
Tire Rack owners 81 78
Tyre Reviews owners 80 –
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 7
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
78
B — Yokohama AVID S34PV
71
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51AVID S34PV
Professional tests (TWG score) 91 –
Tire Rack owners 91 66
Tyre Reviews owners 60 –
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S34PV leads by 2
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
83
B — Yokohama AVID S34PV
85
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51AVID S34PV
Professional tests (TWG score) 94 –
Tire Rack owners 83 82
Tyre Reviews owners 67 –
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 3
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
B — Yokohama AVID S34PV
84
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51AVID S34PV
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 –
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) AVID S34PV leads by 1
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
73
B — Yokohama AVID S34PV
74
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51AVID S34PV
Tire Rack owners 87 74
Tyre Reviews owners 73 –
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID S34PV leads by 7
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
77
B — Yokohama AVID S34PV
84
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51AVID S34PV
Tyre Reviews owners 77 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Yokohama AVID S34PV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Yokohama AVID S34PV
Relative Score 81 79
Dry 85 85
Wet 87 78
Snow 78 71
Comfort 83 85
Noise 87 84
Treadwear 73 74
Handling 77 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Crugen HT51

The Kumho Crugen H/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile highway tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction comparable to premium competitors. While users appreciate its fuel efficiency and handling characteristics, long-term ownership experiences are polarized by reports of uneven tread wear and significant noise degradation over time.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Positive impact on fuel economy
  • Quiet highway performance during early stages of ownership

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature or uneven shoulder wear
  • Limited capability in deep mud or severe winter conditions
  • Noise levels becoming intrusive between 45-55 mph

Observations

  • Users operating heavy-duty trucks like the Ram 1500 report stable handling and good wet-weather confidence.
  • Owners of SUVs like the 4Runner note that while the tire performs well for highway and light off-road use, it is susceptible to shoulder wear patterns.
Tire B Yokohama AVID S34PV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Yokohama AVID S34PV
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, snow and noise. Pick the Yokohama AVID S34PV if handling matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 78 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 78 vs 71 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama AVID S34PV scores 84 vs 77 on handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 84 on noise.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Yokohama AVID S34PV

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.