Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Cooper Evolution Tour vs Yokohama Geolandar G91F — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Cooper Evolution Tour tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
361 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
90
Snow
–
Comfort
91
Noise
89
Treadwear
89
Handling
93

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Geolandar G91F tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
28/100
Owner ratings
Dry
78
Wet
65
Snow
43
Comfort
73
Noise
72
Treadwear
64
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Evolution Tour leads by 16
A — Cooper Evolution Tour
94
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
78
Why this score
SourceEvolution TourGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners – 71
America's Tire owners 94 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Evolution Tour leads by 25
A — Cooper Evolution Tour
90
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
65
Why this score
SourceEvolution TourGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners – 62
America's Tire owners 90 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Cooper Evolution Tour
–
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
43
Why this score
SourceEvolution TourGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners – 82

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Evolution Tour leads by 18
A — Cooper Evolution Tour
91
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
73
Why this score
SourceEvolution TourGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners – 47
America's Tire owners 91 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Evolution Tour leads by 17
A — Cooper Evolution Tour
89
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
72
Why this score
SourceEvolution TourGeolandar G91F
America's Tire owners 89 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Evolution Tour leads by 25
A — Cooper Evolution Tour
89
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
64
Why this score
SourceEvolution TourGeolandar G91F
Tire Rack owners – 77
America's Tire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Evolution Tour leads by 18
A — Cooper Evolution Tour
93
B — Yokohama Geolandar G91F
75
Why this score
SourceEvolution TourGeolandar G91F
America's Tire owners 93 –

Scores at a glance

Cooper Evolution Tour vs Yokohama Geolandar G91F: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper Evolution TourYokohama Geolandar G91F
Relative Score 91 70
Dry 94 78
Wet 90 65
Snow – 43
Comfort 91 73
Noise 89 72
Treadwear 89 64
Handling 93 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cooper Evolution Tour

The Cooper Evolution Tour is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that offers a smooth, comfortable ride and reliable wet-weather performance at an accessible price point. While many users praise its quality and comfort, a notable segment of the user base reports concerns regarding tread life falling short of manufacturer expectations.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement
  • Quiet operation for most driving conditions
  • Positive brand reputation for being a U.S.-based manufacturer

Cons

  • Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
  • Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
  • Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
  • Occasional quality control issues (e.g., air bubbles)

Observations

  • Rideshare drivers report high satisfaction with the tire's comfort and noise levels for passenger transport.
  • Users transitioning from factory-installed premium tires (specifically Michelin) often note a comparable or superior ride quality, though some remain skeptical about long-term durability.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G91F

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper Evolution Tour B · Yokohama Geolandar G91F
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG580 - 600 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper

Yokohama

Winner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 90 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 89 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 91 vs 73 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 93 vs 75 on handling.

Tire A · Cooper Evolution Tour
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91F

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.