Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 vs Yokohama iceGUARD iG20 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Yokohama iceGUARD iG20
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS70 | iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS70 | iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS70 | iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS70 | iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS70 | iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS70 | iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 | Yokohama iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | – |
| Dry | 87 | – |
| Wet | 83 | – |
| Snow | 100 | – |
| Comfort | 92 | – |
| Treadwear | 88 | – |
| Handling | 62 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 is widely regarded as a top-tier performer in severe winter conditions, offering exceptional traction on snow, ice, and slush. While users praise its winter capabilities and low noise levels, some note a lack of stability on dry highways and inconsistent performance in wet conditions due to its soft rubber compound.
Pros
- Phenomenal grip and traction on snow, ice, and slush
- Impressively quiet operation for a winter tire
- Excellent confidence in harsh, Nordic-style winter climates
- Good tread wear longevity despite the soft compound
Cons
- Reduced stability and handling precision on dry pavement at highway speeds
- Squishy or vague steering feel in wet conditions
- Occasional difficulty with take-off traction on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Observations
- Performance appears highly dependent on drivetrain, with AWD/FWD vehicles reporting superior traction compared to RWD configurations.
- The soft compound provides high comfort levels but leads to noticeable instability during high-speed dry highway driving.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 | B · Yokohama iceGUARD iG20 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Yokohama
Only Bridgestone Blizzak WS70 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.