Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Touring tires Updated September 2026

Dayton Touring 2 review

The Dayton Touring 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly tire that offers acceptable performance for daily commuting and standard driving conditions. While many users find it to be a cost-effective alternative to premium brands, performance consistency varies, with some drivers reporting concerns regarding wet-weather traction and long-term tread durability.

Relative score
68/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
75/100
12 reviews
Road tests
58/100
5 published tests

Owners rate it 17.5 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Dayton Touring 2
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

75%
Would buy again 73%
Dry
Overall dry
83%
Corner stability
78%
Dry traction
80%
Steering response
73%
Wet
Overall wet
75%
Wet traction
70%
Comfort
Overall comfort
76%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
72%
Handling
Overall handling
75%

By road tests

57.5%
Dry
38.4%
Wet
50.2%
Noise
70%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
33.1%
Subj. Dry Handling
37.5%
Wet Braking
21.5%
Subj. Wet Handling
25%
Wet Handling
25%
Straight Aquaplaning
62.5%
Inside Noise level
50%
Rolling Resistance
62.5%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 12 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Dayton Touring 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly tire that offers acceptable performance for daily commuting and standard driving conditions. While many users find it to be a cost-effective alternative to premium brands, performance consistency varies, with some drivers reporting concerns regarding wet-weather traction and long-term tread durability.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet operation during normal driving
  • Satisfactory handling and braking in dry conditions
  • Comparable feel to more expensive premium brands for light-duty use

Cons

  • Inconsistent or poor grip on wet surfaces
  • Reports of premature tread wear in some instances
  • Increased road noise as the tire ages
  • Lack of confidence-inspiring traction on steep inclines

Worth knowing

  • Users driving compact vehicles like the Ford Fiesta and Honda Jazz generally report satisfaction with the tire's value for money.
  • Drivers of heavier or more performance-oriented vehicles like the Opel/Vauxhall Astra reported faster tread wear and sidewall instability during spirited driving.
Test results

5 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2020 tire Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18

40th of 49
Best: Dry Braking · 34th Weakest: Wet Braking · 42nd
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking42nd of 49
Dry Braking34th of 49

2019 Mid Range tire Test · 205/55 R16

8th of 8
Best: Rolling Resistance · 4th Weakest: Wet Braking · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking8th of 8
Wet Handling8th of 8
Dry Braking8th of 8
Rolling Resistance4th of 8
Straight Aqua4th of 8
Subj. Dry Handling6th of 8
Subj. Wet Handling7th of 8
Noise5th of 8

2019 Summer 53 tire Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17

33rd of 45
Best: Dry Braking · 26th Weakest: Wet Braking · 36th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking36th of 45
Dry Braking26th of 45

2018 New and Worn Summer tire Test · 205/55 R16

14th of 14
Best: Noise · 8th Weakest: Wet Braking · 14th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking14th of 14
Wet Handling14th of 14
Dry Braking14th of 14
Dry Handling13th of 14
Noise8th of 14

2018 AutoBild Summer tire Overview · 195/65 R15

36th of 47
DisciplinePlacementField position