Skip to content
Updated September 2026

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 review

The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 receives polarized feedback, with users divided between those who find it a high-value performer in diverse conditions and those who report significant traction issues. While some drivers praise its versatility and price point, others express concerns regarding its grip levels and overall reliability in challenging driving scenarios.

Relative score
75/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
74/100
2 reviews
Road tests
71/100
6 published tests
Falken EUROWINTER HS02
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

74%
Would buy again 65%
Dry
Overall dry
90%
Wet
Overall wet
70%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
75%
Comfort
Overall comfort
85%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
85%
Handling
Overall handling
75%

By road tests

70.8%
Dry
91%
Wet
71.3%
Snow
72.3%
Comfort
33.8%
Noise
71.7%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 2 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 receives polarized feedback, with users divided between those who find it a high-value performer in diverse conditions and those who report significant traction issues. While some drivers praise its versatility and price point, others express concerns regarding its grip levels and overall reliability in challenging driving scenarios.

Pros

  • Strong all-around performance in varied weather conditions
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Reliable handling characteristics for daily driving

Cons

  • Lack of confidence-inspiring grip
  • Tendency for wheel spin under acceleration
  • Occasional instability or slipping during cornering

Worth knowing

  • Performance feedback is inconsistent, suggesting the tire's behavior may vary significantly depending on vehicle weight and chassis dynamics.
Test results

6 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2026 Auto Express Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16

7th of 11
Best: Dry Braking · 1st Weakest: Snow Traction · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking5th of 11
Wet Handling3rd of 11
Wet Circle6th of 11
Dry Braking1st of 11
Dry Handling5th of 11
Snow Traction10th of 11
Snow Handling10th of 11
Rolling Resistance6th of 11
Straight Aqua7th of 11
Curved Aquaplaning9th of 11
Noise2nd of 11

2025 AMS Winter tire Test · 215/55 R17

9th of 10
Best: Dry Braking · 5th Weakest: Snow Braking · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking8th of 10
Wet Handling9th of 10
Dry Braking5th of 10
Dry Handling8th of 10
Snow Braking10th of 10
Snow Handling10th of 10
Rolling Resistance6th of 10
Straight Aqua6th of 10
Subj. Comfort7th of 10
Noise5th of 10

2024 Auto Express Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16

6th of 7
DisciplinePlacementField position

2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16

7th of 12
Best: Dry Braking · 1st Weakest: Snow Braking · 12th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking5th of 12
Dry Braking1st of 12
Snow Braking12th of 12
Snow Traction11th of 12
Ice Braking4th of 12
Straight Aqua7th of 12
Curved Aquaplaning7th of 12
Noise3rd of 12
Wear8th of 12
Fuel Consumption10th of 12
Abrasion8th of 12
Wet Braking - Concrete5th of 12

2024 Winter 55 tire Braking Test · 205/55 R16

22nd of 55
Best: Snow Braking · 23rd Weakest: Wet Braking · 25th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking25th of 55
Snow Braking23rd of 55

2023 ADAC 16 Inch tire Test · 205/60 R16

11th of 16
Best: Dry Braking · 1st Weakest: Snow Braking · 16th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 16
Dry Braking1st of 16
Snow Braking16th of 16
Snow Traction15th of 16
Ice Braking8th of 16
Straight Aqua11th of 16
Curved Aquaplaning14th of 16
Noise6th of 16
Wear8th of 16
Fuel Consumption14th of 16
Abrasion12th of 16
Wet Braking - Concrete3rd of 16