Skip to content
Updated September 2026

Giti GitiSynergyH2 review

The Giti GitiSynergyH2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly tire that punches above its weight class in wet weather performance. While many users praise its value and safety in rain, it frequently draws criticism for high noise levels, poor ride comfort, and inconsistent tread longevity, leading to a polarized user experience.

This tire appears to be discontinued and may no longer be available.
Relative score
75/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
69/100
21 reviews
Road tests
76/100
4 published tests
Giti GitiSynergyH2
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

69%
Would buy again 63%
Dry
Overall dry
74%
Wet
Overall wet
82%
Comfort
Overall comfort
70%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
71%
Handling
Overall handling
63%

By road tests

76.3%
Dry
86.5%
Wet
72.9%
Noise
91.6%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 21 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Giti GitiSynergyH2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly tire that punches above its weight class in wet weather performance. While many users praise its value and safety in rain, it frequently draws criticism for high noise levels, poor ride comfort, and inconsistent tread longevity, leading to a polarized user experience.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
  • Highly competitive price point compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry road handling for daily commuting
  • Good value-to-performance ratio for budget-conscious drivers

Cons

  • High cabin noise and boomy resonance on road imperfections
  • Harsh ride quality and lack of steering feedback
  • Reports of premature or uneven tread wear
  • Poor performance in non-paved or winter conditions

Worth knowing

  • Owners of newer VW commercial/passenger vehicles (Caddy, T-Cross) frequently express dissatisfaction with the tire as an OEM choice, citing poor ride quality and handling.
  • Users on larger vehicles or those sensitive to NVH (Noise, Vibration, Harshness) report significant cabin resonance, particularly on 17-inch fitments.
  • Drivers of MPVs and family haulers in Southeast Asia report higher satisfaction, likely due to different road surfaces and driving expectations.
Test results

4 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2026 Summer ECO tire Test · 195/55 R 16

8th of 8
Best: Rolling Resistance · 2nd Weakest: Wet Braking · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking8th of 8
Wet Handling7th of 8
Wet Circle6th of 8
Dry Braking5th of 8
Dry Handling3rd of 8
Rolling Resistance2nd of 8
Straight Aqua7th of 8
Curved Aquaplaning7th of 8
Noise5th of 8
Energy Consumption2nd of 8

2024 AutoBild Summer tire Test · 205/55 R16

15th of 20
Best: Value · 6th Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 20th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking19th of 20
Wet Handling11th of 20
Dry Braking11th of 20
Dry Handling17th of 20
Rolling Resistance20th of 20
Straight Aqua14th of 20
Curved Aquaplaning15th of 20
Noise19th of 20
Value6th of 20
Wear9th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership16th of 20

2023 ADAC Summer tire Test · 205/55 R16

29th of 50
Best: Straight Aqua · 10th Weakest: Wet Braking - Concrete · 39th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking36th of 50
Dry Braking30th of 50
Straight Aqua10th of 50
Value15th of 50
Wear23rd of 50
Fuel Consumption10th of 50
Abrasion33rd of 50
Wet Braking - Concrete39th of 50

2022 ADAC Summer tire Test - 15 Inch · 185/65 R15

6th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position