Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Touring tires Updated September 2026

Goodride SA37 review

The Goodride SA37 is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers exceptional value for money, frequently drawing comparisons to premium brands in terms of dry and wet grip. However, user experiences are inconsistent, with significant reports of quality control issues such as manufacturing defects and poor roundness, alongside concerns regarding rapid tread wear.

Relative score
67/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
63/100
26 reviews
Road tests
68/100
2 published tests
Goodride SA37
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

63%
Would buy again 58%
Dry
Overall dry
74%
Corner stability
62%
Dry traction
71%
Steering response
62%
Wet
Overall wet
66%
Wet traction
65%
Comfort
Overall comfort
63%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
56%
Handling
Overall handling
62%

By road tests

68.4%
Dry
63%
Wet
73.2%
Comfort
69.2%
Noise
87.8%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
35%
Dry Handling
40%
Subj. Dry Handling
40%
Wet Braking
40%
Subj. Wet Handling
20%
Wet Handling
20%
Straight Aquaplaning
55%
Inside Noise level
50%
Subjective Comfort
40%
Rolling Resistance
10%
Price
100%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 26 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Goodride SA37 is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers exceptional value for money, frequently drawing comparisons to premium brands in terms of dry and wet grip. However, user experiences are inconsistent, with significant reports of quality control issues such as manufacturing defects and poor roundness, alongside concerns regarding rapid tread wear.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry and wet weather traction for daily driving
  • Quiet road noise levels
  • Progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Significant quality control issues (out-of-round tires causing vibrations)
  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent manufacturing consistency
  • Lack of road feedback

Worth knowing

  • Users with high-torque or tuned front-wheel-drive vehicles report rapid tread wear, often requiring replacement within 8,000 to 12,000 km.
  • Some users noted that the tire performs surprisingly well on heavier vehicles like the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso, maintaining stability similar to premium alternatives.
Test results

2 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer tire Test · 255/35 R19

9th of 10
Best: Rolling Resistance · 1st Weakest: Dry Braking · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking8th of 10
Wet Handling9th of 10
Dry Braking10th of 10
Dry Handling10th of 10
Rolling Resistance1st of 10
Straight Aqua4th of 10
Curved Aquaplaning4th of 10
Subj. Comfort4th of 10
Noise6th of 10

2020 Auto Zeitung Summer tire Test · 225/50 R17

18th of 20
Best: Price · 1st Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 19th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking13th of 20
Wet Handling17th of 20
Dry Braking14th of 20
Dry Handling13th of 20
Rolling Resistance19th of 20
Straight Aqua10th of 20
Subj. Dry Handling13th of 20
Subj. Comfort18th of 20
Subj. Wet Handling17th of 20
Noise11th of 20
Price1st of 20