Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Touring tires Updated September 2026

GT Radial Champiro FE1 review

The GT Radial Champiro FE1 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, entry-level tire that excels in daily commuting and calm driving conditions. While it offers predictable handling and good value for money, it lacks the precision and grip required for spirited or high-performance driving.

Relative score
69/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
73/100
8 reviews
Road tests
64/100
3 published tests

Owners rate it 9.1 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

GT Radial Champiro FE1
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

73%
Would buy again 66%
Dry
Overall dry
78%
Corner stability
82%
Dry traction
82%
Steering response
72%
Wet
Overall wet
73%
Wet traction
78%
Comfort
Overall comfort
75%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
73%
Handling
Overall handling
79%

By road tests

63.9%
Dry
55.6%
Wet
46.1%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
37.5%
Dry Handling
37.5%
Subj. Dry Handling
37.5%
Wet Braking
37.5%
Wet Handling
37.5%
Straight Aquaplaning
37.5%
Curved Aquaplaning
37.5%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
37.5%
Inside Noise level
100%
Rolling Resistance
100%
Wear
87.5%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 8 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The GT Radial Champiro FE1 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, entry-level tire that excels in daily commuting and calm driving conditions. While it offers predictable handling and good value for money, it lacks the precision and grip required for spirited or high-performance driving.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Predictable and safe handling in dry, normal driving conditions
  • Noticeable reduction in road noise for many users
  • Reliable performance for standard city and highway commuting

Cons

  • Lack of precision and vague feedback during aggressive maneuvers
  • Limited grip in wet or demanding conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Reports of premature sidewall and tread cracking

Worth knowing

  • Rear-wheel drive vehicles with higher power outputs may experience significantly faster rear tire wear compared to front-wheel drive setups.
  • Performance-oriented drivers generally find the tire insufficient for mountain driving or high-speed handling compared to dedicated sport tires.
Test results

3 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2021 53 Summer tire Braking Test · 205/55 R16

37th of 53
Best: Dry Braking · 32nd Weakest: Wet Braking · 37th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking37th of 53
Dry Braking32nd of 53

2018 AutoBild Summer tire Overview · 195/65 R15

30th of 47
DisciplinePlacementField position

2017 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer tire Test

16th of 16
Best: Rolling Resistance · 1st Weakest: Dry Handling · 11th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Dry Handling11th of 16
Subj. Dry Handling11th of 16
Dry Braking11th of 16
Straight Aquaplaning11th of 16
Curved Aquaplaning11th of 16
Wet Braking11th of 16
Wet Handling11th of 16
Side G-Force on Wet surface11th of 16
Rolling Resistance1st of 16
Inside Noise level1st of 16
Wear3rd of 16