Skip to content
Summer tire Summer Touring tires Updated September 2026

Kleber Dynaxer HP 3 review

The Kleber Dynaxer HP 3 is widely regarded as a durable, budget-friendly tire that excels in longevity and dry-weather performance. While users appreciate its value proposition and consistent wear characteristics, it is frequently noted to struggle with wet-weather traction and overall refinement compared to premium alternatives.

Relative score
75/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
72/100
12 reviews
Road tests
73/100
5 published tests
Kleber Dynaxer HP 3
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

72%
Would buy again 64%
Dry
Overall dry
78%
Corner stability
74%
Dry traction
77%
Steering response
69%
Wet
Overall wet
65%
Wet traction
64%
Comfort
Overall comfort
69%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
81%
Handling
Overall handling
74%

By road tests

72.5%
Dry
80.4%
Wet
82.1%
Noise
69.3%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
70.5%
Dry Handling
78.6%
Subj. Dry Handling
89.3%
Wet Braking
54.5%
Subj. Wet Handling
87.5%
Wet Handling
48.2%
Straight Aquaplaning
54.5%
Curved Aquaplaning
71.4%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
71.4%
Inside Noise level
72.3%
Outside Noise
57.1%
Rolling Resistance
68.8%
Wear
100%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 12 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Kleber Dynaxer HP 3 is widely regarded as a durable, budget-friendly tire that excels in longevity and dry-weather performance. While users appreciate its value proposition and consistent wear characteristics, it is frequently noted to struggle with wet-weather traction and overall refinement compared to premium alternatives.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands
  • Predictable and reliable handling in dry conditions
  • Good road feedback for everyday driving

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip and confidence
  • Subpar ride comfort and noise levels
  • Soft sidewall construction which can feel unstable on heavier vehicles
  • Performance degradation over time, particularly in wet conditions

Worth knowing

  • Users with lighter vehicles, such as the Ford Fiesta, report high satisfaction with handling and longevity.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles, such as the Opel Vectra C and Ford Galaxy, reported issues with sidewall stability and a 'floating' sensation, requiring higher tire pressures to compensate.
Test results

5 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2020 ADAC SUV Summer tire Test · 235/55 R17

11th of 12
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wear7th of 12

2019 Mid Range tire Test · 205/55 R16

5th of 8
Best: Subj. Dry Handling · 1st Weakest: Wet Handling · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking6th of 8
Wet Handling7th of 8
Dry Braking4th of 8
Rolling Resistance2nd of 8
Straight Aqua6th of 8
Subj. Dry Handling1st of 8
Subj. Wet Handling2nd of 8
Noise2nd of 8

2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer tire Test · 195/65 R15

18th of 20
Best: Wear · 5th Weakest: Wet Handling · 20th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking13th of 20
Wet Handling20th of 20
Dry Braking20th of 20
Dry Handling16th of 20
Rolling Resistance11th of 20
Straight Aqua17th of 20
Noise14th of 20
Value6th of 20
Price11th of 20
Wear5th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership7th of 20

2018 AutoBild Summer tire Overview · 195/65 R15

18th of 47
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 ADAC Summer tire Test - 175/65 R14 · 175/65 R14

4th of 14
DisciplinePlacementField position