Winter tire Updated September 2026

Laufenn I Fit+ review

Name: Laufenn I Fit+
Brand: Laufenn

Relative score 60% tests + 40% owners

Owners 78 · 4 reviews analysed Road tests 72 · 9 tests

How scores work

Check price on Amazon · I Fit+ Compare with another tire

Add your size for an exact match

Width/AspectRRim

The Amazon link then searches this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

The Laufenn I Fit+ winter tire has generated strongly positive user feedback, significantly exceeding expectations for its price point. Reviewers consistently praise its exceptional traction and performance on snow and ice, as well as its impressive value, describing it as offering near-premium quality on a budget.

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews found online; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

How scores work

Relative score: 0–100. Blends road tests (60%) and owner reviews (40%) category by category, the same way on every TireWheelGuide page. With only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from it, so the score stays closer to average. It needs at least one road test or five owner reviews.
Road tests: 0–100 per score, from published tests, newer tests counting more. Each result is compared with every other tire in the same test, so a win against a strong field counts for more. The average tested tire gets 70, the best 100; with only one or two tests a tire stays nearer 70. The discipline rows show % of the best tire in that test.
Owner reviews: 0–100 from the owner reviews we found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates and scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70. With only a few reviews a tire stays near the average.

By owner reviews

78/100

From 4 owner reviews analysed, scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70.

Would buy again 95%

Dry

Overall dry

78.1

Wet

Overall wet

80.8

Snow & ice

Overall snow & ice

79.3

Comfort

Overall comfort

76.5

Treadwear

Overall treadwear

71.8

Handling

Overall handling

79.4

Own these tires? Write a review →

By road tests

72/100

Scaled across every tested tire: the average gets 70, the best 100.

Dry

71.9

Wet

74.6

Snow

78.3

Noise

75.8

Treadwear

64.7

By discipline (% of best in test)

Dry Braking

85%

Dry Handling

15%

Wet Braking

10%

Wet Handling

10%

Straight Aquaplaning

25%

Snow Braking

70%

Snow Handling

35%

Snow Traction

20%

Inside Noise level

85%

Rolling Resistance

30%

Price

100%

Wear

95%

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 4 owner reviews found online.

Pros

Exceptional traction and performance on deep snow and ice
Unbeatable price-to-quality ratio and overall value
Reliable and safe handling on dry and wet road surfaces
Drives securely in winter conditions, inspiring high driver confidence

Cons

Slightly weaker performance in heavy slush
Difficulty in water evacuation on roads with standing water

Worth knowing

Successfully utilized on the rear axle of a rear-wheel-drive BMW F31 316d, demonstrating reliable winter capability in specific drivetrain applications.

9 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2024 Winter 55 tire Braking Test · 205/55 R16

38th of 55

Discipline	Placement	Field position
Wet Braking	38th of 55

Source: Auto Bild

2023 Auto Bild Winter tire Test · 225/45 R18

13th of 20

Best: Rolling Resistance · 4th Weakest: Straight Aqua · 19th

Discipline	Placement	Field position
Wet Braking	9th of 20
Wet Handling	13th of 20
Wet Circle	13th of 20
Dry Braking	10th of 20
Dry Handling	18th of 20
Snow Braking	10th of 20
Snow Traction	7th of 20
Snow Handling	9th of 20
Rolling Resistance	4th of 20
Straight Aqua	19th of 20
Noise	8th of 20
Value	8th of 20
Wear	17th of 20
Snow Slalom	4th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership	7th of 20

Source: Auto Bild

2023 Winter tire Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18

10th of 54

Best: Wet Braking · 8th Weakest: Snow Braking · 10th

Discipline	Placement	Field position
Wet Braking	8th of 54
Snow Braking	10th of 54

Source: Auto Bild

2021 Auto Bild Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16

20th of 20

Best: Snow Handling · 2nd Weakest: Straight Aqua · 20th

Discipline	Placement	Field position
Wet Braking	9th of 20
Wet Handling	16th of 20
Dry Braking	4th of 20
Dry Handling	3rd of 20
Snow Braking	11th of 20
Snow Traction	7th of 20
Snow Handling	2nd of 20
Rolling Resistance	8th of 20
Straight Aqua	20th of 20
Noise	12th of 20
Value	11th of 20
Price	3rd of 20
Wear	17th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership	8th of 20

Source: Auto Bild

2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter tire Test · 225/50 R17

9th of 16

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: ADAC

2021 Winter tire Market Overview · 205/55 R16

10th of 49

Best: Wet Braking · 9th Weakest: Snow Braking · 11th

Discipline	Placement	Field position
Wet Braking	9th of 49
Snow Braking	11th of 49

Source: Auto Bild

2021 ADAC Winter Tire Test R15 · 195/65R15

9th of 16

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: ADAC

2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter tire Test · 245/45 R18

16th of 20

Best: Value · 1st Weakest: Wet Braking · 19th

Discipline	Placement	Field position
Wet Braking	19th of 20
Wet Handling	19th of 20
Dry Braking	4th of 20
Dry Handling	18th of 20
Snow Braking	7th of 20
Snow Traction	17th of 20
Snow Handling	14th of 20
Rolling Resistance	15th of 20
Straight Aqua	16th of 20
Noise	4th of 20
Value	1st of 20
Wear	2nd of 20
Total Cost of Ownership	3rd of 20