Maxxis Bighorn M/T762 review
The Maxxis Bighorn M/T762 receives highly polarized feedback, with users divided between those who find it a cost-effective, durable workhorse for mixed terrain and those who report severe dissatisfaction with its performance. While some owners praise its longevity and value compared to premium competitors, others report significant issues with traction and overall quality, particularly in challenging weather conditions.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
33%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 3 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Maxxis Bighorn M/T762 receives highly polarized feedback, with users divided between those who find it a cost-effective, durable workhorse for mixed terrain and those who report severe dissatisfaction with its performance. While some owners praise its longevity and value compared to premium competitors, others report significant issues with traction and overall quality, particularly in challenging weather conditions.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium off-road brands
- Competitive tread life for heavy-duty or backcountry use
- Adequate performance on paved surfaces for a dedicated mud-terrain tire
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in snow, ice, and rain
- Inconsistent quality control leading to potential defects
- Disappointing off-road performance in specific regional conditions
Worth knowing
- Users utilizing the tires for professional backcountry work reported consistent mileage around 33,000 km.
- Performance expectations vary significantly by geography, with users in mountainous regions reporting the lowest satisfaction levels.