Michelin e.Primacy review
The Michelin e.Primacy is a polarizing tire that excels in efficiency, comfort, and longevity, making it a popular OEM choice for electric and hybrid vehicles. However, it receives significant criticism for its lackluster wet-weather performance, with many users reporting a lack of confidence and grip in rainy conditions.
Owners rate it 19.9 points lower than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.
Two scoring systems, side by side
Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.
By owner reviews
66%By road tests
85.9%What owners like and dislike
Themes extracted from 29 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.
The Michelin e.Primacy is a polarizing tire that excels in efficiency, comfort, and longevity, making it a popular OEM choice for electric and hybrid vehicles. However, it receives significant criticism for its lackluster wet-weather performance, with many users reporting a lack of confidence and grip in rainy conditions.
Pros
- Excellent fuel and energy efficiency
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Impressive tread life and durability
- Stable and predictable handling in dry conditions
Cons
- Poor grip and traction on wet surfaces
- Reported issues with premature road noise or 'droning' as the tire wears
- Lower initial tread depth compared to standard tires
- Lack of steering feedback and confidence during spirited driving
Worth knowing
- Tesla Model 3 owners frequently report that the tire's low rolling resistance is beneficial for range, but the lack of wet grip is exacerbated by the vehicle's high torque.
- Users note that while the tire is suitable for relaxed, daily commuting, it is often perceived as inadequate for performance-oriented driving or challenging weather conditions.
- Some owners of heavier vehicles or SUVs have noted that the tire's performance drops significantly in non-ideal conditions, such as mud or grass.
7 published test appearances
Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.
Top Tire Review 2026 Tesla Model 3 EV tire Test · 235/45 R18
2nd of 3
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 2nd of 3 | |
| Wet Handling | 2nd of 3 | |
| Dry Braking | 1st of 3 | |
| Dry Handling | 2nd of 3 | |
| Rolling Resistance | 3rd of 3 | |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 1st of 3 | |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 2nd of 3 | |
| Noise | 1st of 3 | |
| Rough Noise | 1st of 3 |
2025 Teknikens Varld Summer tire Test · 235/55 R19
2nd of 8
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 1st of 8 | |
| Wet Handling | 4th of 8 | |
| Dry Braking | 4th of 8 | |
| Subj. Comfort | 1st of 8 |
2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) tire Test · 205/55 R16
3rd of 7
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 3rd of 7 | |
| Wet Handling | 3rd of 7 | |
| Dry Braking | 1st of 7 | |
| Dry Handling | 6th of 7 | |
| Rolling Resistance | 1st of 7 | |
| Straight Aqua | 6th of 7 | |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 7th of 7 | |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 5th of 7 | |
| Subj. Comfort | 2nd of 7 | |
| Noise | 3rd of 7 |
2025 AMS Sustainability tire Test · 215/55 R17
4th of 6
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 5th of 6 | |
| Wet Handling | 5th of 6 | |
| Dry Braking | 5th of 6 | |
| Dry Handling | 5th of 6 | |
| Rolling Resistance | 1st of 6 | |
| Straight Aqua | 3rd of 6 | |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 4th of 6 | |
| Noise | 1st of 6 |
2023 The Best Electric Vehicle tires VS UHP tires · 255/45 R20
3rd of 10
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 1st of 10 | |
| Wet Handling | 7th of 10 | |
| Dry Braking | 5th of 10 | |
| Dry Handling | 9th of 10 | |
| Rolling Resistance | 2nd of 10 | |
| Straight Aqua | 9th of 10 | |
| Noise | 1st of 10 | |
| Price | 9th of 10 | |
| Energy Consumption | 3rd of 10 |
2023 ADAC Summer tire Test · 205/55 R16
38th of 50
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 38th of 50 | |
| Dry Braking | 3rd of 50 | |
| Straight Aqua | 48th of 50 | |
| Value | 9th of 50 | |
| Wear | 1st of 50 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 1st of 50 | |
| Abrasion | 1st of 50 | |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 41st of 50 |
2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal tire Test · 205/55 R16
9th of 10
| Discipline | Placement | Field position |
|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | 9th of 10 | |
| Wet Handling | 9th of 10 | |
| Dry Handling | 8th of 10 | |
| Rolling Resistance | 1st of 10 | |
| Straight Aqua | 10th of 10 | |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 10th of 10 | |
| Price | 10th of 10 | |
| Fuel Consumption | 2nd of 10 |
What owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of the scores above.
Community opinions on the Michelin e.Primacy are generally favorable regarding their efficiency, range improvements, and lower road noise compared to stock tires like the Continental EcoContact or Energy Savers. However, drivers note that wet and winter grip can feel less confidence-inspiring, leading to a trade-off between energy savings and ultimate traction performance. Users also debate pricing and availability, particularly as a newer alternative to options like the Hankook iON evo or Michelin CrossClimate2.
From 16 threads and comments.