Skip to content
Updated September 2026

Minerva All Season Master review

The Minerva All Season Master is viewed as a capable budget-friendly option, particularly when paired with all-wheel-drive systems. While it delivers commendable performance in dry and wet conditions, its capabilities diminish significantly in challenging winter scenarios, specifically regarding lateral grip on snow and ice.

Relative score
74/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
77/100
1 review
Road tests
66/100
5 published tests

Owners rate it 11.2 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Minerva All Season Master
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

77%
Would buy again 80%
Dry
Overall dry
80%
Wet
Overall wet
80%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
70%
Comfort
Overall comfort
60%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
90%
Handling
Overall handling
90%

By road tests

65.8%
Dry
61.1%
Wet
56.5%
Snow
82.5%
Noise
59%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 1 owner review across retailers and review sites.

The Minerva All Season Master is viewed as a capable budget-friendly option, particularly when paired with all-wheel-drive systems. While it delivers commendable performance in dry and wet conditions, its capabilities diminish significantly in challenging winter scenarios, specifically regarding lateral grip on snow and ice.

Pros

  • Strong dry road handling and steering response
  • Reliable wet weather traction with minimal understeer
  • Effective acceleration from a standstill in snow
  • High value proposition for 4x4 vehicle owners

Cons

  • Reduced braking performance in snowy conditions
  • Poor lateral stability on snow and ice during cornering
  • Limited suitability for FWD vehicles in severe winter climates

Worth knowing

  • Performance is notably better suited for 4x4 vehicles compared to front-wheel-drive configurations.
  • The tire exhibits a tendency to pull sideways in tight, low-traction corners, which may be more pronounced on lighter FWD platforms.
Test results

5 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season tire Test · 245/45 R18

10th of 10
Best: Noise · 1st Weakest: Dry Braking · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 10
Wet Handling9th of 10
Dry Braking10th of 10
Dry Handling9th of 10
Snow Braking4th of 10
Snow Traction10th of 10
Snow Handling10th of 10
Rolling Resistance10th of 10
Straight Aqua10th of 10
Noise1st of 10
Snow Circle9th of 10

2024 Minivan / SUV All Season tire Test · 235/55 R17

12th of 12
Best: Price · 1st Weakest: Wet Handling · 12th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking11th of 12
Wet Handling12th of 12
Wet Circle12th of 12
Dry Braking6th of 12
Dry Handling9th of 12
Snow Braking10th of 12
Snow Traction11th of 12
Snow Handling11th of 12
Rolling Resistance9th of 12
Straight Aqua12th of 12
Noise8th of 12
Price1st of 12
Snow Slalom8th of 12

2024 All Season tire Market Overview · 225/50 R17

29th of 37
Best: Wet Braking · 28th Weakest: Dry Braking · 31st
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking28th of 37
Dry Braking31st of 37

2023 All Season tire 35 Set Shootout · 225/45 R17

17th of 35
Best: Wet Braking · 15th Weakest: Dry Braking · 27th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking15th of 35
Dry Braking27th of 35

2022 All Season tire Market Overview · 195/55 R16

22nd of 35
Best: Dry Braking · 20th Weakest: Wet Braking · 29th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking29th of 35
Dry Braking20th of 35