Skip to content
Updated September 2026

Nexen N Blue S review

The Nexen N Blue S receives mixed feedback, often praised for its quiet, comfortable ride and impressive wet-weather traction in budget-conscious applications. However, long-term durability is a significant point of contention, with several users reporting premature tread wear and structural degradation, particularly when used as an OEM fitment.

Relative score
84/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
86/100
10 reviews
Road tests
72/100
1 published test

Owners rate it 14.1 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Nexen N Blue S
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

86.2%
Would buy again 48%
Dry
Overall dry
88.8%
Wet
Overall wet
91.2%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
100%
Comfort
Overall comfort
89.2%
Noise
Overall noise
96.7%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
80%
Handling
Overall handling
78%

By road tests

72.1%
Dry
74.7%
Wet
85.4%
Comfort
84.3%
Noise
67.1%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 10 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Nexen N Blue S receives mixed feedback, often praised for its quiet, comfortable ride and impressive wet-weather traction in budget-conscious applications. However, long-term durability is a significant point of contention, with several users reporting premature tread wear and structural degradation, particularly when used as an OEM fitment.

Pros

  • Excellent noise suppression and ride comfort
  • Strong wet-weather traction and braking performance
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Improved grip compared to some factory-standard tires

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short service life
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague handling characteristics
  • Poor shock absorption on uneven road surfaces
  • Inconsistent performance longevity compared to premium competitors

Worth knowing

  • Users with FWD vehicles, such as the Buick Encore, reported significant improvements in snow and rain traction compared to stock tires.
  • Drivers of compact vehicles like the VW Golf 8 and Audi A3 noted that the OEM-specific versions of this tire suffer from accelerated wear and tread chunking.
Test results

1 published test appearance

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) tire Test · 205/55 R16

6th of 7
Best: Straight Aqua · 1st Weakest: Subj. Dry Handling · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking5th of 7
Wet Handling5th of 7
Dry Braking5th of 7
Dry Handling5th of 7
Rolling Resistance3rd of 7
Straight Aqua1st of 7
Curved Aquaplaning2nd of 7
Subj. Dry Handling7th of 7
Subj. Comfort6th of 7
Noise6th of 7